jig
Health Warn
- License — License: MIT
- Description — Repository has a description
- Active repo — Last push 0 days ago
- Low visibility — Only 5 GitHub stars
Code Pass
- Code scan — Scanned 12 files during light audit, no dangerous patterns found
Permissions Pass
- Permissions — No dangerous permissions requested
No AI report is available for this listing yet.
A Claude Code and Codex plugin that scaffolds AI-native development practices into new projects. jig adds a repeatable spec, implementation, review, and memory workflow to AI-assisted software projects.

A Claude Code and Codex workflow layer that scaffolds AI-native development practices into new projects.
jig (noun): a tool that guides other tools to work accurately and consistently.
Why jig
Two years of AI-assisted coding leave the same scars on every non-trivial
project: LLMs refactor whole layers before anything works end-to-end, "done"
drifts because no acceptance criteria are written down, implementers grade
their own homework, and mega-packs burn the context budget before your work
loads. jig encodes the workflow that prevents each one — so you don't
rediscover it session by session.
→ The jig philosophy — the full why: the named
scars, how jig thinks, and the honest objections.
What it does
Idea → Spec → Vertical slice → Implementation → Independent review → Reconciliation → Done
jig installs a focused, opinionated workflow layer into your project:
- Spec-driven development — SPIDR-split vertical slices, each with its own
Definition of Done. - Multi-perspective review — a fresh, read-only reviewer checks every
slice against its spec (compliance), plus a craft pass and an on-demand
architecture pass. - Memory layer — cross-session continuity via hot cache + deep storage +
inbox. - Deterministic gates — hooks enforce what must happen; skills carry
judgment.
A fixed, opinionated set — 7 Tier 0 skills at the floor and 13 more on by
default (Tier 1) — not a hundred-skill marketplace. For the full picture, see
product-vision.md (vision, target users, principles)
and architecture.md (mechanics).
Principles jig encodes
The convictions behind the mechanisms — each one wired into something concrete,
not left as advice:
- The harness matters more than the model. jig is a harness: the
instructions an agent reads, the tools it can run, the feedback loops that
correct it, the isolation boundaries that contain it. Swapping models won't
close a workflow gap — the scaffold does. - Guardrails, not guidelines. What must happen is enforced mechanically by
deterministic gates: hooks for immediate local checks (secret scanning,
spec-file gates) and workflow transitions for lifecycle evidence
(review-evidence gates, reconciliation artifacts). What takes judgment
lives in skills. The line between a deterministic gate and an advisory nudge
is drawn on purpose. - The context window is working memory, not a storage buffer. Irrelevant
context degrades reasoning, so jig keeps a lean hot cache, loads deeper docs
on demand, and delegates file-heavy reading to subagents that return only a
summary. - Designed to reduce token cost. Beyond keeping context lean for quality,
jig is built to keep token usage — and the bill — down: lean context,
file-heavy reading delegated to subagents, tight output. It also measures its
own spend rather than guessing at it. - Review is the bottleneck. Agents produce faster than review capacity
grows, so jig won't let implementers grade their own homework: a fresh,
read-only reviewer checks every slice against its spec, and the verdicts are
durable artifacts that gate the next state. - Specs and docs are code, and they ship in slices. Specs, ADRs, and the
memory layer are version-controlled and reconciled before a slice lands — so
"done" never drifts, and work arrives as vertical slices instead of one big-bang
mega-commit.
These are the outward-facing worldview; several are also load-bearing build
rules jig holds itself to, spec by spec — see
product-vision § Design principles
for the operational detail.
jig now ships one development experience across Claude Code and Codex: the same
workflow model, rendered into host-native files by the host-adapter layer
(spec 033). The next big
horizon is coordination across a multi-repo workspace (a federation tier —
spec 034).
Start here
New to jig? Read the
adoption & readiness guide first — who jig is
for, what your repo needs, and your first 30 minutes.
Install
Claude plugin
/plugin marketplace add ramboz/jig
/plugin install jig@jig
Claude scaffold
git clone https://github.com/ramboz/jig.git
python3 jig/hosts/claude/skills/scaffold-init/scaffold.py --in-repo <your-project>
Codex plugin
codex plugin marketplace add ramboz/jig
codex plugin add jig@jig
Codex scaffold
git clone https://github.com/ramboz/jig.git
python3 jig/hosts/codex/plugins/jig/skills/scaffold-init/scaffold.py --host codex --in-repo <your-project>
Which pair do I want? The two scaffold recipes are self-contained —
they copy jig's machinery into your project, so it works with no plugin
installed. The two plugin recipes leave the machinery
in the plugin and keep your repo lean — that's the default when jig runs as an
installed plugin. See
ADR-0041.
Project setup
Once installed, open a new project directory in Claude Code and say:
"Set up this project for AI-native development"
The scaffold-init skill will run and produce the docs/ scaffolding.
Copy-paste prompts live in the prompt cookbook, in
the order you run them: scaffold the repo once, then repeat the idea-to-landed
loop for every feature.
Extension points
Bring your own depth; jig provides the floor.
A few jig skills — pr-review, arch-review, contracts, security-review,code-health, explain, vision-elicitation — ship as lightweight baselines
that defer to a richer user-installed skill in the
same category when one is present. The deferral is category-based, not
name-specific, so your own reviewer skill wins automatically, with no
configuration. jig stays opinionated about workflow and out of the way of
the judgment skills you've already invested in. Detail:
product-vision § Design principles.
Verifying a host install
Each host is verified in its own environment — one host's check does not
prove the other installs and runs:
- Claude:
python3 scripts/verify_install.pyconfirms the install
footprint, andpython3 scripts/build_release_zip.py --host claude --smoke-test <zip>exercises the committedhosts/claudepackage. Spec
061-06 owns the full Claude install-verification slice. - Codex:
python3 scripts/codex_install_smoke.pyvalidates the committedhosts/codexpackage and probes a live Codex CLI when present. Spec 061-07
owns the full Codex install-verification slice.
From source (contributors)
See CONTRIBUTING.md for the local-marketplace
workflow used during development.
Repository structure (for contributors)
Three peers: the canonical source root, the committed hosts/claude
package, and the committed hosts/codex package. The two host packages are
committed, source-derived build outputs — kept fresh by the drift guard
(python3 scripts/build_host_packages.py [--check]) and NOT hand-edited.
The host packages have different internal shapes: Claude is a flat
plugin (.claude-plugin/plugin.json at the package root) while Codex is
marketplace-wrapped (hosts/codex/.agents/plugins/marketplace.json +hosts/codex/plugins/jig/...).
# Canonical source root (dev tooling + the tree the host packages build from):
.claude-plugin/plugin.json # Claude plugin source manifest
.claude-plugin/marketplace.json # remote-install pointer → ./hosts/claude
.agents/plugins/marketplace.json # Codex remote-install pointer → ./hosts/codex/plugins/jig
.codex-plugin/plugin.json # Codex plugin source manifest
skills/ # Skill definitions (SKILL.md per skill)
agents/ # Subagent definitions
hooks/ # Hook configuration + Python scripts
scripts/ # Top-level dev scripts (verify-install, …)
templates/ # Source templates scaffold-init generates from
docs/ # Dev docs for jig itself (dogfooded workflow)
specs/ # Specs for jig's own features
memory/ # jig's own memory layer
decisions/ # Architectural decisions (ADRs)
# Committed, drift-guarded host packages (built from source; NOT hand-edited):
hosts/
claude/ # COMMITTED flat Claude plugin package
codex/ # COMMITTED marketplace-wrapped Codex package
.agents/plugins/marketplace.json
plugins/jig/ # the Codex plugin tree
dist/ # gitignored — host-explicit release ZIPS ONLY
Contributing
Read CONTRIBUTING.md for the local install + verify flow,
then docs/workflow.md for the spec lifecycle. Every
change to jig starts with a spec. PRs squash-merge with conventional-commit
titles (feat(scope): … / fix(scope): …); the pr-title.yml workflow
enforces the shape, and CONTRIBUTING § Releasing has the version-bump effect of
each prefix.
How jig compares against other AI-native playbooks — and where each known gap
is owned — lives in
CONTRIBUTING § Comparison and gap response.
Status
Tier 0 and Tier 1 are complete — all 20 skills, 3 subagents, and the jig hooks
ship today, and jig is dogfooded on its own spec lifecycle. For live per-slice
state, see the status board.
Supported today: Claude Code and Codex in scaffold and plugin shapes from
the shared source tree. Codex role prompts are bundled as prompt source, rendered
to TOML for scaffold mode, and installable for plugin users via the explicit
Codex agent helper; plugin-native Codex custom-agent discovery remains the
tracked follow-up in spec 033.
Reviews (0)
Sign in to leave a review.
Leave a reviewNo results found