agent-11
Health Pass
- License — License: MIT
- Description — Repository has a description
- Active repo — Last push 0 days ago
- Community trust — 10 GitHub stars
Code Warn
- fs module — File system access in .github/workflows/validate-agents.yml
Permissions Pass
- Permissions — No dangerous permissions requested
No AI report is available for this listing yet.
Opensource AI development agent suite for solo founders. Deploy 11 specialized agents in Claude Code with one command. https://buymeacoffee.com/jamiewatters
AGENT-11™
Your Elite AI Development Squad
One Founder. Eleven Specialists. Unlimited Potential.
If AGENT-11 has saved you time or helped you ship faster, consider ⭐ starring the repo or buying me a coffee ☕ to support development!
🆕 First Time? · 🚀 Quick Start · 🎯 Workflows · 📖 Docs · 💬 Support
What is AGENT-11?
AGENT-11 deploys 11 specialized AI agents to your project, orchestrating them through proven workflows to build production-ready software. Think of it as hiring an elite development team - except they're AI agents working together seamlessly.
Instead of prompting Claude Code for every task, AGENT-11 provides:
- 🎯 Specialized Agents - Each with domain expertise (requirements, architecture, coding, testing, design, etc.)
- 🎖️ Coordinated Workflows - 20 pre-built missions that orchestrate multiple agents automatically
- 🧠 Persistent Context - Knowledge that survives across sessions and agent handoffs
- ✅ Quality Assurance - Built-in testing, verification, and security protocols
How AGENT-11 Works with BOS-AI
AGENT-11 is the technical execution arm of the BOS-AI ecosystem. BOS-AI handles strategic planning (30 business agents) → AGENT-11 handles software development (11 technical agents).
You can use AGENT-11 standalone without BOS-AI. → Complete BOS-AI Integration Guide
🆕 First Time? Start Here
Complete setup from scratch in 5 minutes. If you already have a project with git initialized, skip to Quick Start.
Prerequisites
- Claude Code installed and running (Get Claude Code)
- GitHub CLI for repo creation:
brew install gh(macOS) or GitHub CLI install - BOS-AI documents (optional): PRD, Vision, Brand docs from BOS-AI
Step-by-Step: New Project Setup
# 1. Create your project directory
mkdir my-project && cd my-project
# 2. Initialize git
git init
# 3. Create GitHub repository (private recommended)
gh repo create my-project --private --source=. --push
# 4. Install AGENT-11
curl -sSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TheWayWithin/agent-11/main/project/deployment/scripts/install.sh | bash -s full
# 5. Restart Claude Code
/exit
claude
After Installation: Choose Your Path
Path A: Using BOS-AI Documents (recommended for new products)
# Copy your BOS-AI documents
mkdir -p documents/foundations
cp ~/path/to/bos-ai-docs/*.md documents/foundations/
# Run the full workflow
/foundations init # Process docs into structured YAML
/architect # Design system architecture (select "Engaged Mode")
/bootstrap # Generate project plan (select "Engaged Mode")
/plan status # Verify everything is ready
/coord continue # Start autonomous execution
Path B: Starting from Scratch (no BOS-AI docs)
# Create a simple vision document
echo "# My Product\n\nDescription of what I want to build..." > vision.md
# Initialize with dev-setup mission
/coord dev-setup vision.md
# Or jump straight to MVP
/coord mvp vision.md
Path C: Existing Codebase (adding AGENT-11 to existing project)
# Analyze existing project and create docs
/coord dev-alignment
→ Detailed setup guide | → Troubleshooting
The Complete Workflow: Idea → Shipped Product
BOS-AI Documents → /foundations init → /architect → /bootstrap → /coord continue → 🚀 Shipped
| Step | Command | What It Does | Mode Recommendation | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Process Docs | /foundations init |
Extracts PRD, Vision, ICP, Brand into structured YAML | N/A (automatic) | 2-5 min |
| 2. Design System | /architect |
Interactive architecture decisions → creates architecture.md | Engaged Mode (first time) | 10-15 min |
| 3. Generate Plan | /bootstrap |
Generates phased project-plan.md with tasks | Engaged Mode (first time) | 1-5 min |
| 4. Check Status | /plan status |
Shows current phase, progress, blockers | N/A | Instant |
| 5. Execute | /coord continue |
Autonomous execution until blocked or phase complete | N/A | Hours-Days |
Step-by-Step Walkthrough
Step 1: /foundations init - Process your BOS-AI documents# First, copy your BOS-AI documents to the foundations directory
mkdir -p documents/foundations
cp ~/Documents/BOS-AI/*.md documents/foundations/
# Then run the extraction
/foundations init
What happens: Scans documents/foundations/ and extracts structured YAML from each document type (PRD → features, tech stack; Vision → goals, mission; Brand → colors, typography, etc.)
Output: Creates .context/structured/*.yaml files that agents can parse directly
When to re-run: After editing any foundation document, run /foundations refresh to sync changes
→ Full /foundations documentation
Step 2: /architect - Design your system architecture/architect # Interactive mode selection (recommended)
/architect --mode engaged # Skip selection, go straight to engaged
/architect --mode auto # Use PRD defaults (experienced users)
Mode Selection:
- Engaged Mode (recommended for new projects): Walks you through 7 decision areas with explanations and trade-offs. Takes 10-15 minutes but prevents costly mistakes.
- Auto Mode: Uses tech stack from PRD + sensible defaults. Best for regenerating after minor changes or when you know exactly what you want.
The 7 Decision Areas (Engaged Mode):
- Application Architecture: Monolith vs modular vs microservices
- Frontend Stack: Framework version, rendering strategy, styling, component library
- Backend & Database: Database config, multi-tenancy strategy, API layer approach
- Authentication: Provider selection, auth methods, session strategy, user roles
- External Integrations: Payments (billing model, webhooks), AI models, email service
- Infrastructure: Frontend/backend hosting, CI/CD pipeline, environments
- Security & Observability: API security, error tracking, analytics, logging
Output: Creates comprehensive architecture.md (~400 lines) with system diagrams, decision log, and integration patterns
Prerequisites: Must run /foundations init first
→ Full /architect documentation
Step 3: /bootstrap - Generate your project plan/bootstrap # Interactive mode selection (recommended)
/bootstrap --mode engaged # Review PRD assumptions with checkpoints
/bootstrap --mode auto # Generate immediately (no questions)
/bootstrap --mode preview # Preview without writing files
Mode Selection:
- Engaged Mode (recommended for new projects): Reviews 5 checkpoints to validate PRD assumptions before generating. Catches misunderstandings early.
- Auto Mode: Trusts your PRD completely and generates immediately. Best for validated PRDs or regeneration.
- Preview Mode: Shows what would be generated without creating files.
The 5 Checkpoints (Engaged Mode):
- Foundation Summary: Verify product info and P0 features extracted correctly
- Tech Stack: Confirm framework versions, integrations, AI model selections
- Priority Validation: Review P0/P1/P2 feature assignments
- Phase Structure: Approve phase breakdown and task distribution
- Final Confirmation: Review all decisions before generating
Output: Creates phased project-plan.md with:
- Phase 1: Fully detailed with tasks, acceptance criteria, and quality gates
- Phase 2+: Outlined with key milestones (rolling wave planning)
Prerequisites: Must run /foundations init first
→ Full /bootstrap documentation
Step 4: /plan status - Check progress/plan status # Overview of current state
/plan phase 1 # Deep dive into specific phase
/plan next # What's coming up
What it shows: Current phase, completed tasks, blockers, next actions, quality gate status
Step 5: /coord continue - Autonomous execution/coord continue # Execute until blocked or phase complete
What happens: The Coordinator reads project-plan.md, identifies the next task, delegates to the appropriate specialist (Developer, Tester, etc.), verifies completion, and moves to the next task.
When it stops: At phase boundaries, when blocked by a question, or when quality gates need verification.
After phase complete:
/coord complete phase 1 # Generate next phase context
/clear # Clear conversation context
/coord continue # Resume from project-plan.md
→ Full mission orchestration documentation
Quick Start Command Sequence
# 1. Copy your BOS-AI docs to the project
cp ~/Documents/BOS-AI/*.md ./documents/foundations/
# 2. Process foundation documents
/foundations init
# 3. Design architecture (FIRST TIME: select "Engaged Mode" when prompted)
/architect
# 4. Generate project plan (FIRST TIME: select "Engaged Mode" when prompted)
/bootstrap
# 5. Review what was created
/plan status
# 6. Start building (autonomous)
/coord continue
Skip BOS-AI? Start directly with /coord dev-setup vision.md or /coord mvp requirements.md
🆕 Current Version: v5.2.0
Latest: Dynamic MCP tool loading with 93% token reduction (51K → 3.3K). No more manual profile switching.
→ Full Release History - Complete sprint-by-sprint changelog
Is AGENT-11 Right for You?
✅ Perfect For:
- Solo founders building products without technical teams
- Developers who want structured AI assistance with quality assurance
- Technical projects requiring multiple specialties (frontend, backend, DevOps, testing)
- Long-running projects needing context preservation across sessions
❌ Not Ideal For:
- Simple scripts or one-off tasks (use Claude Code directly)
- Projects requiring constant human oversight (AGENT-11 is autonomous)
- Non-technical work (use BOS-AI for business operations)
What You Can Build
The Ultimate Proof: AGENT-11 Built by AGENT-11
The deployment system you just used was built by AGENT-11 itself—from concept to working system in under 1 day. Complete automated installation, agent orchestration, configuration management, and error handling. 98% success rate, <1 second deployment.
If AGENT-11 can build itself, it can build anything.
Your projects can include:
- SaaS applications with AI analysis, authentication, payment processing
- Marketplace platforms with OAuth, reviews, community features
- Web applications with Next.js, React, Tailwind CSS, modern stacks
- API services with REST/GraphQL endpoints, third-party integrations
- Business tools with analytics, automation, data pipelines
Time to MVP: 1-3 days with /coord mvp mission
→ See 7+ Real Production Projects
Why AGENT-11 Works
The SaaS Boilerplate Killer: Why pay $300-500 for a static starter kit that still needs customization? AGENT-11 builds your entire application from scratch—authentication, payments, dashboards, APIs—all tailored to your exact requirements. No boilerplate limitations. No template constraints. Just your vision, built to spec.
Proven Performance (v2.0 Results):
- 100% file persistence - Architectural solution eliminates silent failures completely
- 39% effectiveness improvement - Extended thinking + self-verification for better decisions
- 84% token reduction - Context editing + memory optimization enables 30+ hour missions
- 37.5% faster missions - Zero rework from file persistence failures
- Time to MVP: Traditional team (3-6 months) → AGENT-11 (2-4 weeks)
- Cost per Feature: Traditional ($10-50k) → AGENT-11 (<$500)
→ Complete Performance Metrics
Your Squad
Core Squad (4 agents):
- 🎯 Strategist - Product vision and requirements analysis
- 💻 Developer - Code implementation at light speed
- ✅ Tester - Zero bugs reach production (SENTINEL Mode)
- 🚀 Operator - Deploy with confidence
Specialist Squad (7 agents):
- 🏗️ Architect - Bulletproof technical decisions
- 🎨 Designer - Interfaces that convert (RECON Protocol)
- 📚 Documenter - Knowledge captured perfectly
- 💬 Support - Users become advocates
- 📊 Analyst - Data drives decisions
- 📈 Marketer - Growth on autopilot
- 🎖️ Coordinator - Mission commander (PARALLEL STRIKE)
🚀 Quick Start (5 Minutes)
Installation
# Navigate to your project directory
cd /path/to/your/project
# Deploy AGENT-11
curl -sSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TheWayWithin/agent-11/main/project/deployment/scripts/install.sh | bash -s full
# Restart Claude Code
/exit
claude
Prerequisites: Project needs git repo, README, or package file (package.json, requirements.txt)
Verification
/agents # List deployed agents (should show 11)
@strategist What should we build first? # Test an agent
First Mission
From BOS-AI docs: /foundations init → /architect → /bootstrap → /coord continue (full workflow)
Existing project: /coord dev-alignment (analyzes codebase, creates docs)
New project: /coord dev-setup vision.md (initializes project structure)
Build feature: /coord build requirements.md
→ Complete setup guide: Essential Setup Guide for installation troubleshooting, MCP setup, and detailed verification steps.
🎯 Common Workflows
Learn the most common AGENT-11 workflows with real examples, time estimates, and expected outcomes.
Quick Reference
| Workflow | Command | Duration | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| MVP | /coord mvp vision.md |
1-3 days | Rapid prototyping with auth, payments, deployment |
| Bug Fix | /coord fix bug-report.md |
2-4 hours | Root cause analysis, fix, regression tests |
| Design Review | /design-review |
1-2 hours | 7-phase UI/UX audit (RECON Protocol) |
| Feature | /coord build requirements.md |
4-8 hours | Complete feature with tests and docs |
| Security | /coord security |
2-3 hours | Vulnerability scanning, compliance checks |
| Refactor | /coord refactor target.md |
2-4 hours | Code quality improvement, tech debt |
| Performance | /coord optimize metrics.md |
3-6 hours | Bottleneck identification, optimization |
| Deploy | /coord deploy |
1-2 hours | Production deployment with monitoring |
Workflow Details
1. MVP Development - Build production-ready MVP in 1-3 days
- Full stack: auth, payments, testing, deployment
- Example: LLM.txt Mastery built in 3 days
- Cost: $5-10 in API usage
2. Bug Fixes - Debug and resolve production issues in 2-4 hours
- Root cause analysis, fix implementation, regression tests
- Cost: $0.50-1.50 in API usage
3. Design Review - Comprehensive UI/UX audit in 1-2 hours
- 7-phase RECON Protocol: Interaction, responsive, visual, accessibility, robustness, performance
- Deliverables: Issues classified by severity, screenshots, compliance report
- Cost: $0.50-1 in API usage
4. Feature Development - Build complete features in 4-8 hours
- Strategist → Architect → Developer → Tester → Documenter workflow
- Deliverables: Code, tests, API docs, deployment checklist
- Cost: $1-3 in API usage
5. Security Audit - Comprehensive security review in 2-3 hours
- OWASP Top 10, dependency scanning, compliance validation (SOC2, GDPR)
- Deliverables: Vulnerability report, fixes, security documentation
- Cost: $2-4 in API usage
6. Code Refactoring - Improve code quality in 2-4 hours
- Technical debt reduction, performance improvements
- All tests pass (no functionality changes)
- Cost: $0.75-2 in API usage
7. Performance Optimization - Tune application performance in 3-6 hours
- Bottleneck identification, query optimization, caching strategy
- Deliverables: Before/after benchmarks, performance report
- Cost: $1.50-3 in API usage
8. Production Deployment - Safe deployment in 1-2 hours
- Pre-deployment tests, zero-downtime deploy, monitoring, rollback plan
- Deliverables: Live deployment, smoke tests, runbook
- Cost: $0.50-1 in API usage
→ Complete workflow guide: Common Workflows Guide for:
- Detailed mission breakdowns with agent sequences
- Real-world examples and expected outcomes
- Recovery strategies for interrupted missions
- Verification procedures and deliverable checklists
More Workflows
AGENT-11 includes 20 pre-built missions covering every development need:
Setup & Initialization:
- DEV-SETUP - New project initialization (30-45 min)
- DEV-ALIGNMENT - Understand existing project (45-60 min)
- CONNECT-MCP - Setup external integrations (45-90 min)
Development Operations:
- REFACTOR - Code quality improvement (2-4 hours)
- DEPLOY - Production deployment (1-2 hours)
- DOCUMENT - Documentation creation (2-4 hours)
- MIGRATE - System migration (4-8 hours)
Performance & Quality:
- OPTIMIZE - Performance tuning (3-6 hours)
- INTEGRATE - Third-party APIs (3-6 hours)
- RELEASE - Release management (2-4 hours)
→ See all 20 missions with commands
→ Mission execution guide - Complete execution manual
⚙️ Essential Setup
Beyond basic installation, configure advanced features for production readiness.
Testing Infrastructure
Automatic setup during missions. Manual: @tester "Set up testing infrastructure"
MCP Integration
Running out of context during long missions? AGENT-11's MCP system optimizes context usage for your workflow.
🚀 Dynamic Tool Loading (v5.2.0+ - Recommended)
The new dynamic MCP tool loading system eliminates manual profile switching with 93% context reduction:
| Approach | Initial Context | Reduction |
|---|---|---|
| All Tools (static) | 51,000 tokens | baseline |
| Profile-based (legacy) | 3,000-15,000 tokens | 40-80% |
| Dynamic Loading | 3,300 tokens | 93% |
How it works: Agents discover and load tools on-demand using Tool Search. No profile switching required.
Quick Setup (Dynamic):
# Use dynamic MCP configuration
cp project/mcp/dynamic-mcp.json .mcp.json
# Configure API keys
cp .env.mcp.template .env.mcp
# Edit .env.mcp with your credentials
# Restart Claude Code
Documentation:
- 📖 MCP Setup Guide - Complete setup and usage instructions
- 🔄 Migration Guide - Migrate from profiles to dynamic loading
- 🔧 Troubleshooting - Common issues and solutions
Legacy: Profile-Based System
Profile-based MCP switching is still supported. See MCP-PROFILES.md for documentation.
Project Initialization
New: /coord dev-setup ideation.md (30-45 min) | Existing: /coord dev-alignment (45-60 min)
🏗️ How AGENT-11 Works
Understanding the architecture helps you maximize effectiveness through visual diagrams and clear explanations.
System Architecture Overview
graph TB
subgraph User["👤 User Layer"]
U[Developer/Founder]
end
subgraph Mission["🎯 Mission Layer"]
CMD["/coord Command"]
M1["20 Pre-built Missions"]
M2["Custom Workflows"]
end
subgraph Coord["🎖️ Coordination Layer"]
C[Coordinator Agent]
PP["project-plan.md<br/>(Planning)"]
AC["agent-context.md<br/>(Knowledge)"]
HN["handoff-notes.md<br/>(Handoffs)"]
PR["progress.md<br/>(History)"]
end
subgraph Agents["🤖 Specialist Layer"]
S[Strategist]
A[Architect]
D[Developer]
T[Tester]
O[Operator]
Des[Designer]
Doc[Documenter]
Sup[Support]
Ana[Analyst]
Mar[Marketer]
end
subgraph Tools["🔧 Tool Layer"]
R[Read/Write/Edit]
B[Bash/Git]
MCP["MCP Integrations<br/>(GitHub, Playwright, etc.)"]
Mem["Memory API<br/>(/memories/)"]
end
U --> CMD
CMD --> M1
CMD --> M2
M1 --> C
M2 --> C
C --> PP
C --> AC
C --> HN
C --> PR
C --> S
C --> A
C --> D
C --> T
C --> O
C --> Des
C --> Doc
C --> Sup
C --> Ana
C --> Mar
S --> R
A --> R
D --> R
D --> B
T --> R
O --> B
O --> MCP
Des --> MCP
Doc --> R
S --> Mem
A --> Mem
D --> Mem
style U fill:#e1f5ff
style CMD fill:#fff4e6
style C fill:#f3e5f5
style S fill:#e8f5e9
style A fill:#e8f5e9
style D fill:#e8f5e9
style T fill:#e8f5e9
style O fill:#e8f5e9
style Des fill:#e8f5e9
style Doc fill:#e8f5e9
style Sup fill:#e8f5e9
style Ana fill:#e8f5e9
style Mar fill:#e8f5e9
style Mem fill:#fffde7
Three-Layer Architecture Explained:
- Mission Layer - 20 pre-built missions + custom workflows via
/coord - Coordination Layer - Context preservation, parallel execution, dependency resolution
- Specialist Layer - 11 agents with domain expertise, tool permissions, extended thinking, self-verification
Agent Collaboration Flow
How specialists work together with zero context loss:
sequenceDiagram
participant U as 👤 User
participant C as 🎖️ Coordinator
participant S as 🎯 Strategist
participant A as 🏗️ Architect
participant D as 💻 Developer
participant T as ✅ Tester
participant AC as 📝 agent-context.md
participant HN as 🤝 handoff-notes.md
U->>C: /coord build requirements.md
C->>AC: Read mission context
C->>HN: Initialize handoff system
Note over C: Phase 1: Analysis
C->>S: Analyze requirements
S->>AC: Read existing context
S->>S: Create user stories (30-45 min)
S->>HN: Write findings for Architect
S->>AC: Update with decisions
Note over C: Phase 2: Design
C->>A: Design solution
A->>AC: Read strategist findings
A->>HN: Read specific handoff
A->>A: Create architecture (30-45 min)
A->>HN: Write specs for Developer
A->>AC: Update with design decisions
Note over C: Phase 3: Implementation
C->>D: Implement feature
D->>AC: Read all prior context
D->>HN: Read architect specs
D->>D: Write code + tests (2-4 hours)
D->>HN: Document implementation
D->>AC: Update with code decisions
Note over C: Phase 4: Validation
C->>T: Validate quality
T->>AC: Read full mission context
T->>HN: Read developer notes
T->>T: Run comprehensive tests (1 hour)
T->>HN: Report test results
T->>AC: Final quality assessment
C->>U: Mission complete ✅
Note over AC,HN: Zero context loss!<br/>100% knowledge preserved
Key Collaboration Principles:
- Sequential Handoffs - Each agent reads context from previous agents via handoff-notes.md
- Cumulative Knowledge - All decisions stored in agent-context.md for mission-wide awareness
- Zero Loss - Every finding, decision, and issue preserved across the entire mission
Context Management System
How AGENT-11 preserves 100% of knowledge across sessions and agent handoffs:
flowchart TD
subgraph Input["📥 Mission Input"]
MI["/coord build requirements.md"]
end
subgraph Context["🧠 Context Files"]
AC["agent-context.md<br/>━━━━━━━━━━━<br/>• Mission objectives<br/>• All findings (cumulative)<br/>• Technical decisions<br/>• Known issues<br/>• Dependencies"]
HN["handoff-notes.md<br/>━━━━━━━━━━━<br/>• Immediate task<br/>• Critical context<br/>• Warnings/blockers<br/>• Specific instructions<br/>• Test results"]
ER["evidence-repository.md<br/>━━━━━━━━━━━<br/>• Screenshots<br/>• Code snippets<br/>• Test results<br/>• API responses<br/>• Error logs"]
end
subgraph Memory["💾 Persistent Memory"]
MEM["/memories/<br/>━━━━━━━━━━━<br/>project/<br/> - overview.xml<br/> - architecture.xml<br/>technical/<br/> - patterns.xml<br/> - decisions.xml<br/>lessons/<br/> - insights.xml"]
end
subgraph Agents["🤖 Agents"]
A1[Agent reads context]
A2[Agent performs work]
A3[Agent updates context]
end
subgraph Output["📤 Deliverables"]
PP["project-plan.md<br/>(What we're doing)"]
PR["progress.md<br/>(What we did)"]
CODE["Code, Tests, Docs"]
end
MI --> AC
MI --> HN
AC --> A1
HN --> A1
MEM --> A1
A1 --> A2
A2 --> A3
A3 --> AC
A3 --> HN
A3 --> ER
A3 --> MEM
AC --> PP
AC --> PR
HN --> PP
HN --> PR
A2 --> CODE
style AC fill:#e3f2fd
style HN fill:#f3e5f5
style ER fill:#fff3e0
style MEM fill:#e8f5e9
style A1 fill:#fffde7
style A2 fill:#fffde7
style A3 fill:#fffde7
Context Preservation Protocol:
- Before Task - Agent reads agent-context.md + handoff-notes.md + /memories/
- During Task - Agent maintains awareness of all prior decisions
- After Task - Agent updates handoff-notes.md with findings for next specialist
- Coordinator - Merges findings into agent-context.md for mission-wide knowledge
Result: Zero context loss, 100% knowledge retention across sessions
→ Complete context management guide
Mission Execution Lifecycle
From command to deliverables - the complete mission workflow:
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> Planning: /coord build requirements.md
Planning --> Analysis: Create project-plan.md
note right of Planning
Coordinator reads mission
Creates execution plan
Initializes context files
end note
Analysis --> Design: Strategist completes
note right of Analysis
Requirements analysis
User story creation
Success criteria defined
30-45 minutes
end note
Design --> Implementation: Architect completes
note right of Design
System design
Technology selection
Architecture documentation
30-45 minutes
end note
Implementation --> Testing: Developer completes
note right of Implementation
Code implementation
Unit test creation
Documentation updates
2-4 hours
end note
Testing --> Verification: Tests pass
note right of Testing
E2E test execution
Quality validation
Regression checks
1 hour
end note
Verification --> Complete: All verified
note right of Verification
Self-verification protocols
Deliverable confirmation
Progress documentation
15 minutes
end note
Testing --> Implementation: Tests fail
Implementation --> Implementation: Bugs found
Complete --> [*]: Mission success ✅
note right of Complete
progress.md updated
Learnings stored in /memories/
Ready for next mission
end note
Mission Phases Explained:
- Planning (5-10 min) - Coordinator reads mission, creates project-plan.md with phases
- Analysis (30-45 min) - Strategist analyzes requirements, creates user stories
- Design (30-45 min) - Architect designs system, selects technologies
- Implementation (2-4 hours) - Developer writes code, creates tests
- Testing (1 hour) - Tester validates quality, runs comprehensive test suite
- Verification (15 min) - Self-verification protocols ensure completeness
Total Time: 4-8 hours for standard feature development
Key Concepts
Context Preservation: Zero loss via agent-context.md + handoff-notes.md + /memories/. Extended Thinking: Ultrathink/Think harder/Think modes (39% effectiveness improvement). Tool Permissions: Least-privilege security model (64% read-only agents). Parallel Execution: Independent tasks run simultaneously for speed.
→ Memory Management | → Extended Thinking | → Tool Permissions
BOS-AI Integration
Workflow: BOS-AI (strategy) → AGENT-11 (execution)
# 1. Copy BOS-AI outputs to ideation/
# 2. Initialize: /coord dev-setup ideation/PRD.md
# 3. Build: /coord build ideation/PRD.md
→ Complete BOS-AI Integration Guide
🚀 Features & Capabilities
Complete overview of AGENT-11's capabilities organized by category.
Context Management
100% knowledge retention with native memory API, zero-loss context preservation (agent-context.md, handoff-notes.md), and strategic /clear usage (84% token reduction enabling 30+ hour missions).
→ Memory Management | → Context Editing
Project Management
Dual-file tracking (project-plan.md, progress.md with complete fix history), 20 pre-built mission workflows via /coord, automatic greenfield/brownfield bootstrap with CLAUDE.md generation.
→ Progress Tracking | → Bootstrap Guide | → Mission Library
Quality Assurance
SENTINEL Mode with separation of duties (zero bugs reach production), self-verification protocols (50% rework reduction), comprehensive testing (mcp__playwright, cross-browser, WCAG AA+).
→ Testing Guide | → Enhanced Prompting
Advanced Capabilities
Extended thinking modes (Ultrathink/Think harder/Think hard/Think - 39% effectiveness improvement), 15+ MCP integrations (GitHub, Playwright, Context7, Firecrawl, Supabase), RECON Protocol design reviews with 7-phase audit, OpsDev workflow with staging validation.
→ Extended Thinking | → Tool Permissions | → UI Doctrine
Performance Metrics
| Capability | Measurement | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Mission Success | +15% (v4.0) | Opus 4.6 coordinator intelligence |
| Cost Efficiency | -24% total cost | Opus iterations offset token cost |
| Agent Effectiveness | 39% improvement | Extended thinking + self-verification |
| Token Efficiency | 84% reduction | Context editing + memory optimization |
| MCP Context | 60-90% reduction | Lean profile system (v4.1) |
| Autonomous Operation | 30+ hours | Multi-day missions without intervention |
| Rework Reduction | 50% fewer errors | Pre-handoff verification catches issues |
| Context Retention | 100% persistence | Zero knowledge loss across sessions |
| Time to MVP | 2-4 weeks | vs 3-6 months traditional |
| Cost per Feature | <$500 | vs $10-50k traditional |
→ Complete Performance Analysis
Known Limitations
AGENT-11 is powerful but not unlimited. Understanding these constraints helps you work effectively within the system.
1. Large Codebases
- Issue: Projects with >50 files may exceed context window during analysis
- Workaround: Break work into modules, use phased approach with multiple missions
- Command:
@coordinator "Focus only on [specific module/feature]"
2. Complex Dependencies
- Issue: Some packages require manual configuration (native bindings, platform-specific tools)
- Workaround: Let agents set up what they can, complete manual steps with provided instructions
- Example: Database setup, API key configuration, external service accounts
3. Mission Interruptions
- Issue: If mission fails mid-way, context may be partially lost
- Workaround: Check progress.md for completed work, resume from last checkpoint
- Command:
@coordinator "Resume from last checkpoint in progress.md"
4. API Rate Limits
- Issue: Claude API rate limits may pause long-running missions (>2 hours)
- Workaround: Break into smaller phases, use
/clearbetween phases to reset context - Recovery: Wait 1-5 minutes, then continue with next phase
5. Context Size Management
- Issue: Very large files (>2000 lines) or long conversations exceed context window
- Workaround: Use Glob/Grep for targeted searches instead of reading entire files
- Command:
@coordinator "Search for [specific pattern] instead of reading whole file"
6. Browser Automation Limitations
- Issue: Some JavaScript-heavy sites may not work with Playwright automation
- Workaround: Use manual testing for complex UI, automated for standard paths
- When: Design reviews of SPAs, PWAs, or sites with heavy client-side rendering
7. Platform-Specific Issues
- Issue: Some commands work differently on Windows vs Mac vs Linux
- Workaround: Use cross-platform alternatives (npm scripts vs shell scripts)
- Example: Prefer
npxover direct binary calls, Node.js scripts over bash
8. Agent Specialization Boundaries
- Issue: Some tasks don't fit cleanly into one agent's role
- Workaround: Use
/coordmissions for cross-functional work requiring multiple agents - Example: Security audit needs @architect + @developer + @tester coordination
9. Learning Curve
- Issue: First-time users need 1-2 hours to understand agent system and workflows
- Workaround: Start simple - use
/meetingfor conversations, progress to single @agent commands, then to/coordmissions - Progression: Individual agents → simple missions → complex orchestration
10. Single-User Operation
- Issue: No real-time collaboration between multiple humans on same project
- Workaround: Use git branches for parallel work, merge through standard PR process
- Best Practice: One person runs missions, team reviews results via PR
11. Internet Dependency
- Issue: Requires active internet connection for Claude API access
- Workaround: Work offline on manual tasks, run missions when connection available
- Impact: No offline development assistance
12. Token Costs
- Issue: API usage costs vary by mission complexity ($0.50-$10 per mission)
- Workaround: Start with smaller missions to estimate costs, use
/coordefficiently - Monitoring: Check API usage in Claude dashboard, set budget alerts
→ Complete capabilities and limitations guide
Feature Documentation
3,750+ lines of comprehensive guides: Memory Management | Bootstrap | Context Editing | Extended Thinking | Tool Permissions | Enhanced Prompting
🆘 Getting Unstuck Protocol
Quick Recovery: /clear + @coordinator "I'm stuck" | System Check: /agents, ls .claude/agents/ | Test: @developer "Create hello world HTML" | Escalation: Troubleshooting | @support | GitHub Issues | Discord
📚 Complete Documentation
🚀 Quick Start
📖 Setup & Configuration
- Project Deployment | Update Installation | MCP Integration | MCP Troubleshooting | Greenfield | Brownfield
🎯 Mission Execution
🏗️ Architecture & Planning
🆕 Modernization Guides (v2.0-v4.1)
- Memory Management | Bootstrap Guide | Context Editing | Extended Thinking | Tool Permissions | Enhanced Prompting
- v4.0+: Model Selection Guide | MCP Optimization Guide
🎨 Quality & Design
📚 Agent & Mission Reference
🛠️ Templates
💬 Getting Help
@support| Troubleshooting | Success Stories | GitHub Issues | Discord
📊 Mission Progress Tracking System
AGENT-11 uses a dual-file tracking system: project-plan.md (forward-looking roadmap) and progress.md (backward-looking changelog with complete issue history including all fix attempts). This approach enables 10-40x faster resolution of similar future issues.
→ Complete Progress Tracking Guide
🔄 Project Lifecycle Management
Three-tier cleanup strategy prevents context pollution: Milestone Transition (every 2-4 weeks), Project Completion (when shipping), or Continue Active Work. Lessons extracted to searchable repository while keeping active context lean (200 lines vs 20,000+).
→ Complete Lifecycle Management Guide | → Cleanup Checklist
🧪 Testing & Quality Assurance
Separation of duties: Tester analyzes (read-only), Developer implements tests, Tester validates. SENTINEL Mode runs 7-phase protocol for critical releases. Zero bugs reach production with 80%+ coverage on critical paths.
🚀 Your First Mission
Pattern: /coord [mission] [input-file.md] or @agent for direct access. Examples: /coord build requirements.md | /coord fix bug-report.md | /coord mvp vision.md
→ Mission Execution Guide | → Mission Library
🎮 Command Reference
AGENT-11 provides 12 slash commands for the complete development workflow:
📋 Planning Commands (BOS-AI → Execution)
These commands transform foundation documents into executable project plans:
📥 /foundations - Document Processing
Extract structured data from BOS-AI foundation documents into agent-consumable YAML
/foundations init # Initial extraction of all documents
/foundations refresh # Sync changes (new, modified, removed docs)
/foundations status # Show document states and checksums
/foundations validate # Verify completeness before building
Subcommands:
| Command | When to Use | What It Does |
|---|---|---|
init |
First time setup | Scans documents/foundations/, extracts ALL to structured YAML |
refresh |
After any document changes | Syncs directory → detects new, modified, removed documents |
status |
Check current state | Shows all documents with checksums and modification status |
validate |
Before /bootstrap |
Verifies required docs present and extractions complete |
Foundation → YAML Mapping (9 categories):
| Foundation Document | Output YAML | Schema Contains |
|---|---|---|
| prd.md, -prd-.md, requirements.md | prd.yaml |
Features, tech stack, metrics, business rules, state machines |
| vision-mission.md, vision.md | vision.yaml |
Vision, mission, hedgehog concept, core values |
| strategic-roadmap.md, roadmap.md | roadmap.yaml |
Phases, deliverables, milestones, success criteria |
| client-success-blueprint.md, icp.md | icp.yaml |
Personas, pain points, JTBD, anti-personas |
| market-and-client-research.md, research.md | research.yaml |
Competitive analysis, market research |
| brand-style-guidelines.md, brand.md | brand.yaml |
Colors, typography, components, shadows, animations |
| positioning-statement.md, positioning.md | positioning.yaml |
Core positioning, competitive differentiation, messaging |
| marketing-bible.md, go-to-market.md | marketing.yaml* |
Go-to-market, channels, launch strategy |
| pricing-strategy.md, pricing.md | pricing.yaml |
Tiers, Marketing Physics, value ladder, upgrade triggers |
*marketing.yaml only generated if dedicated marketing document exists (not positioning)
Common Workflows:
# Initial setup (first time)
cp ~/BOS-AI-output/*.md documents/foundations/
/foundations init
# After editing documents
/foundations refresh # Only re-extracts what changed
# After adding new document (e.g., pricing)
cp ~/BOS-AI-output/pricing-strategy.md documents/foundations/
/foundations refresh # Detects and extracts new document
# Before building
/foundations validate # Ensures everything is ready
Output: .context/structured/*.yaml files + handoff-manifest.yaml
🏛️ /architect - System Design
Generate architecture.md with all technical decisions before planning
/architect # Interactive mode selection (recommended)
/architect --mode engaged # Walk through 7 decision areas
/architect --mode auto # Use PRD defaults
/architect --stack nextjs-supabase # Use predefined stack profile
When to Use Each Mode:
| Mode | Best For | Time | Recommended When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engaged | New projects, first-time users | 10-15 min | You want to understand trade-offs and make informed decisions |
| Auto | Regeneration, experienced users | 1-2 min | Your PRD is detailed and you trust the defaults |
Mode Selection (when you run /architect without flags):
How would you like to proceed?
1. Auto Mode - Use PRD defaults
2. Engaged Mode - Walk through decisions (recommended)
Engaged Mode - What You'll Decide (7 areas):
| Decision | What You Choose | Example Options |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Application Architecture | Overall structure | Monolith (MVP), Modular Monolith, Microservices |
| 2. Frontend Stack | Framework + styling | Next.js 14 + Tailwind + shadcn/ui |
| 3. Backend & Database | Database + API approach | Supabase + RLS, multi-tenancy strategy |
| 4. Authentication | Auth provider + methods | Clerk/Supabase Auth, OAuth providers, roles |
| 5. External Integrations | Services + billing model | Stripe subscription, AI models, email (Resend) |
| 6. Infrastructure | Hosting + CI/CD | Vercel, Railway, GitHub Actions |
| 7. Security & Observability | Monitoring + security | Sentry, PostHog, rate limiting |
What it generates:
- Comprehensive
architecture.md(~400 lines) - System diagrams and component relationships
- Decision log with rationale for each choice
- Integration patterns and security policies
Prerequisites: Run /foundations init first
Example Engaged Mode Question:
🏗️ Decision 1/7: Application Architecture
Your PRD indicates a web application with these features:
- User authentication
- Dashboard with data visualization
- AI-powered features
Options:
1. Monolith (Recommended for MVP)
Fast to build, easy to deploy, refactor later
2. Modular Monolith
Clear boundaries, easier to split later
3. Microservices
⚠️ Overkill for MVP - adds operational complexity
Select [1/2/3]:
🏗️ /bootstrap - Plan Generation
Transform foundation documents + architecture.md into executable project-plan.md
/bootstrap # Interactive mode selection (recommended)
/bootstrap --mode engaged # Review PRD assumptions with checkpoints
/bootstrap --mode auto # Generate immediately (no questions)
/bootstrap --mode preview # Preview without writing files
/bootstrap --mode auto --type api # Auto mode with explicit project type
When to Use Each Mode:
| Mode | Best For | Time | Recommended When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engaged | New projects, first-time users | 3-5 min | You want to validate PRD extraction and priorities |
| Auto | Regeneration, trusted PRDs | 30 sec | Your PRD is validated and you want speed |
| Preview | Inspection | 30 sec | You want to see the plan before committing |
Mode Selection (when you run /bootstrap without flags):
How would you like to proceed?
1. Auto Mode - Generate immediately (fast, no questions)
2. Engaged Mode - Review assumptions first (recommended for new users)
3. Preview Mode - Show what would be generated
Engaged Mode - What You'll Review (5 checkpoints):
| Checkpoint | What You Verify | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Foundation Summary | Product name, description, P0 features | Catches extraction errors early |
| 2. Tech Stack | Framework versions, integrations | Ensures correct dependencies |
| 3. Priority Validation | P0/P1/P2 feature assignments | Controls MVP scope |
| 4. Phase Structure | Phase breakdown, task count | Validates effort estimates |
| 5. Final Confirmation | All decisions summary | Last chance before generation |
What it generates:
- Phased
project-plan.mdwith rolling wave detail - Phase 1: Fully detailed with tasks, acceptance criteria, and quality gates
- Phase 2+: Outlined with key milestones (detailed when you reach them)
- Quality gates configured per project type (blocking/warning/info)
Prerequisites: Run /foundations init and /architect first
Example Engaged Mode Checkpoint:
📋 Checkpoint 2/5: Tech Stack Confirmation
From your PRD and architecture.md:
Frontend: Next.js 14 (App Router)
Styling: Tailwind CSS + shadcn/ui
Backend: Supabase (PostgreSQL + RLS)
Auth: Clerk
Payments: Stripe
Is this correct? [Y/n/edit]:
📊 /plan - Project State Management
View and manage project state, phases, and quality gates
/plan status # Current phase, progress, blockers
/plan next # What's coming up
/plan phase 2 # Deep dive into Phase 2
/plan gate 2 # Quality gate status for Phase 2
/plan update task 3 complete # Mark task complete
/plan archive # Archive completed phases
Subcommands:
| Command | Purpose |
|---|---|
status |
Progress overview, blockers, next action |
next |
Upcoming tasks and phase previews |
phase N |
Detailed phase breakdown |
gate N |
Quality gate validation status |
update |
Update task status, add blockers |
archive |
Archive completed phases for context savings |
🧰 /skills - SaaS Skill Discovery
Discover and manage production-ready SaaS code patterns
/skills # List all available skills
/skills saas-auth # Show auth skill details
/skills match "stripe payments" # Find matching skills
/skills stack # Show current stack profile
Available Skills (auto-loaded by Coordinator based on task keywords):
| Skill | Triggers | Tokens |
|---|---|---|
saas-auth |
auth, login, oauth | ~3,800 |
saas-payments |
stripe, checkout, subscription | ~4,200 |
saas-multitenancy |
tenant, org, rls | ~4,100 |
saas-billing |
billing, plan, quota | ~3,900 |
saas-email |
email, resend, notification | ~3,200 |
saas-onboarding |
onboarding, wizard | ~3,500 |
saas-analytics |
analytics, posthog | ~3,600 |
How it works: When task descriptions contain trigger keywords, the Coordinator automatically loads the relevant skill and delegates to the appropriate specialist with production-ready patterns.
🚀 Execution Commands
🎖️ /coord - Mission Orchestration
Orchestrate multi-agent missions with automatic specialist coordination
# Pattern: /coord [mission] [input-file.md]
/coord build requirements.md # Feature development (4-8 hours)
/coord fix bug-report.md # Bug resolution (1-3 hours)
/coord mvp vision.md # Build MVP (1-3 days)
/coord dev-setup ideation.md # Project initialization (30-45 min)
/coord dev-alignment # Analyze existing project (45-60 min)
What it does:
- Automatically delegates to appropriate specialists
- Maintains context across agent handoffs
- Updates project-plan.md and progress.md
- Ensures quality through built-in verification
🤝 /meeting - Strategic Conversations
Have natural, conversational discussions with specialists for brainstorming and planning
# Pattern: /meeting @agent [topic]
/meeting @strategist # Product strategy discussion
/meeting @architect "microservices vs monolith" # Architecture consultation
/meeting @designer "improving user onboarding" # Design brainstorming
/meeting @developer "real-time data synchronization" # Technical problem-solving
When to use:
- Brainstorming new features or approaches
- Getting expert advice before formal missions
- Exploring technical decisions and trade-offs
- Creative collaboration and idea generation
Available specialists: @strategist, @architect, @coordinator, @developer, @tester, @designer, @operator, @marketer, @analyst, @documenter, @support
🎨 /design-review - UI/UX Audit
Comprehensive design audit using RECON Protocol with automated testing
/design-review # Full 7-phase UI/UX audit with evidence
What it analyzes (7-phase RECON Protocol):
- Preparation - Environment setup, baseline screenshots
- Interaction - User flows, micro-interactions, navigation
- Responsive - Mobile, tablet, desktop compatibility
- Visual - Typography, spacing, hierarchy, consistency
- Accessibility - WCAG AA+ compliance, screen readers
- Robustness - Edge cases, error states, loading
- Performance - Load times, console errors
Deliverables:
- Issues classified by severity (BLOCKER/HIGH/MEDIUM/NITPICK)
- Screenshots and reproduction steps
- Accessibility compliance report
- Specific recommendations with examples
🔍 /recon - Design Intelligence
Quick design reconnaissance for understanding existing UI/UX patterns
/recon # Rapid design analysis and pattern identification
What it does:
- Analyzes current design system and patterns
- Identifies UI/UX strengths and weaknesses
- Documents design decisions and rationale
- Provides strategic design recommendations
Use when: Need quick design assessment before major changes or starting new features
📊 /report - Progress Reports
Generate stakeholder-ready progress reports automatically
# Pattern: /report [since_date]
/report # Last 7 days (default)
/report 2025-08-20 # Since specific date
Report includes:
- Executive summary of progress
- Completed tasks with business impact
- Issues encountered and resolutions
- Current project status and health
- Key metrics and trends
- Next milestones and resource needs
- BOS-AI alignment (if integrated)
Output: Creates progress-report.md with professional formatting suitable for stakeholders, clients, or management
🔬 /pmd - Post Mortem Analysis
Systematic root cause analysis of failures to prevent recurrence
# Pattern: /pmd [issue_description]
/pmd # Analyze recent failures from progress.md
/pmd "Coordinator not using Task tool" # Analyze specific issue
/pmd "Installation failing on Windows" # Analyze deployment failure
Analysis covers:
- Agent Performance - Prompt clarity, scope compliance, tool usage
- Documentation Quality - CLAUDE.md accuracy, task definitions
- Tool Usage - MCP prioritization, error handling
- Process Issues - Planning, communication, testing coverage
Deliverables:
- Timeline of events leading to failure
- Root cause analysis with evidence
- Immediate fixes (do now)
- Short-term improvements (this week)
- Long-term enhancements (this month)
- Prevention strategies and detection mechanisms
Output: Creates post-mortem-analysis.md with actionable recommendations
📅 /dailyreport - Daily Progress Reports + Social Media Posts
Turn today's progress.md entries into a structured daily report plus voice-aligned blog, Twitter/X, and LinkedIn posts for build-in-public sharing
/dailyreport # Extract today's work from progress.md and generate all four files
Report includes:
- Completed milestones grouped by context (features, fixes, infrastructure, docs)
- Issues & learnings with root cause analysis and failed-attempt history
- Lessons learned and patterns noticed
- Next steps for tomorrow
Output Files (4 files per day):
progress/
├── 2026-04-11.md # Raw daily report (source of truth)
├── 2026-04-11-blog.md # Long-form blog post (voice-aligned)
├── 2026-04-11-twitter.md # Twitter/X post (copy-paste ready)
└── 2026-04-11-linkedin.md # LinkedIn post (copy-paste ready)
Social Media Features:
- Twitter/X: 180-260 char sweet spot, dual-link OG preview structure, 1-2 hashtags
- LinkedIn: 800-1000 char sweet spot, hook-optimized first 140 chars, genuine closing question
- Copy-paste ready: character count validated,
{{PRODUCT_URL}}placeholder for final edit - Voice-aligned: every post follows your voice guide (see below)
Claude-native architecture: /dailyreport is pure Claude Code — no Python script,
no OPENAI_API_KEY, no external API costs. Claude reads your progress.md, drafts the
structured report, and derives all three derived outputs following the voice guide to
the letter. This is the same pipeline /blog uses.
Use when:
- End of work day for daily build-in-public updates
- After major milestone completion
- When switching between multiple projects
- For authentic progress transparency
Benefits:
- Blog-ready markdown format
- Platform-optimized social posts (Twitter/X + LinkedIn)
- Shows both wins and challenges, including failed fix attempts
- Documents learnings for future reference
- No API keys, no usage costs, works immediately after install
Voice Alignment: /dailyreport and /blog share a voice guide system. Drop avoice-guide.md in your project root (or set DAILYREPORT_VOICE_GUIDE=/path/to/file.md)
and every generated post follows your voice. The built-in default is tuned for authentic,
non-AI-sounding build-in-public writing. See the voice alignment docs
for the full resolution chain.
✍️ /blog - Topic-Driven Blog Posts + Social Media Posts
Draft a long-form blog post and matching Twitter/X + LinkedIn versions on any topic, pulling context from your repo
# Inline topic
/blog why I stopped using feature flags for small teams
# Brief file
/blog briefs/cron-incident.md
# Topic with explicit context files
/blog the file persistence bug --context progress/2025-11-19.md post-mortem-analysis.md
/dailyreport turns a structured progress log into a build-in-public update. /blog
is for everything else: opinion pieces, tutorials, deep dives, post-mortems, reactions
— any writing that isn't tied to a daily changelog. Both commands share the same
Claude-native pipeline, the same voice guide file, and the same social post format.
The only difference is the shape of the input: /dailyreport parses structured
progress logs, /blog takes any topic you want to write about.
Output Files (3 files per post):
blog/
├── 2026-04-11-feature-flags-small-teams.md # Long-form blog post (400-1200 words)
├── 2026-04-11-feature-flags-small-teams-twitter.md # Twitter/X (180-260 char, copy-paste ready)
└── 2026-04-11-feature-flags-small-teams-linkedin.md # LinkedIn (800-1000 char, copy-paste ready)
What Claude does on each run:
- Resolves the voice guide (same chain as
/dailyreport— custom file, env var, or default) - Reads
README.md,CLAUDE.md, the brief file (if given), any--contextfiles, and
intelligently pulls in related files (e.g.progress.mdfor a bug story) - Drafts the long-form post following every voice rule
- Derives Twitter/X and LinkedIn versions from the long-form post
- Runs an AI-tell scrub and rewrites any banned vocabulary before writing files
- Writes all three files to
blog/and previews the Twitter post inline
When to use /blog vs /dailyreport:
| Situation | Command |
|---|---|
End-of-day progress update from progress.md |
/dailyreport |
| Opinion piece, tutorial, deep dive, post-mortem story | /blog |
| Build-in-public changelog narrative | /dailyreport |
| Reaction or explainer on any topic | /blog |
Both commands write in the same voice and share the same voice guide file. Define your
voice once, use it everywhere.
Shared configuration (same env vars as /dailyreport):
DAILYREPORT_VOICE_GUIDE=/path/to/voice-guide.md # Custom voice guide (optional)
DAILYREPORT_BASE_URL=yourdomain.com # Used in social post blog links
See full /blog documentation for argument forms, drafting
rules, troubleshooting, and examples.
📦 /planarchive - Intelligent Context Management
Automatically archive completed work from tracking files using semantic analysis and smart triggers
# Pattern: /planarchive [options]
/planarchive # Interactive mode with analysis
/planarchive --analyze # Show what would be archived with reasoning
/planarchive --aggressive # Archive ALL completed work
/planarchive --target-lines=1200 # Archive until reaching specific size
/planarchive --check-duplicates # Find duplicated content
What it analyzes (5 intelligent triggers):
- Completed Sprint Rule - Sprints marked COMPLETE + >7 days old
- Size-Based Rule - Sections >500 lines that are complete
- Dated Phase Rule - Phases with COMPLETE status + old dates
- Duplication Rule - Content duplicated in .env.example, architecture.md
- Historical Detail Rule - Code snippets/guides from completed work
Archival Scoring System:
Score = (age_days × 0.3) + (size_lines × 0.2) + (completion_status × 0.5)
- Score ≥0.8: High priority (archive immediately)
- Score 0.5-0.8: Medium priority
- Score <0.5: Low priority (keep active)
What gets archived:
- project-plan.md: Completed sprints, resolved risks, locked decisions
- progress.md: Entries older than threshold (default: 14 days), resolved issues
What stays active:
- Executive summary and current objectives
- Active work (pending tasks, unresolved issues)
- Last 7 entries minimum
- Content from last 7 days (unless --aggressive)
Key Features:
- Semantic Analysis - Understands completion status, dates, section hierarchy
- Auto-Summaries - Generates 2-3 sentence summaries for archived content
- Token Optimization - Reports estimated token savings
- Safety First - Automatic backups, reversible operations, validation checks
Token Budget Levels:
- ✅ Optimal: <15,000 tokens
- ⚠️ Warning: 25,000-35,000 tokens (should archive)
- 🚨 Critical: >35,000 tokens (mandatory archival)
Command Options:
--analyze- Show archival analysis with scores and reasoning (dry run)--aggressive- Archive ALL completed work regardless of age--target-lines=N- Archive until reaching specific line count--check-duplicates- Identify content duplicated across files--days=N- Archive entries older than N days (default: 14)--no-summaries- Keep full content instead of generating summaries
Output:
📊 Archive Analysis Complete
project-plan.md:
- Sprint 1: 692 lines, age 25d, score 0.92 → ARCHIVE
- Sprint 2: 487 lines, age 18d, score 0.85 → ARCHIVE
Total: 1,179 lines (61% reduction)
progress.md:
- 28 entries >14 days (890 lines) → ARCHIVE
Total: 890 lines (47% reduction)
Estimated token savings: ~4,250 tokens (63% reduction)
Archive Locations:
project-plan-archive.md- Archived phases, sprints, completed tasksprogress-archive.md- Archived progress entries, resolved issues
Use when:
- End of sprint/phase (natural archive point)
- Before major mission (start with clean context)
- Files exceed 25,000 tokens (context overhead)
- Monthly maintenance (regular hygiene)
Benefits:
- Keeps tracking files lean and efficient (<1,200 lines ideal)
- Reduces token overhead for faster agent reads
- Preserves complete history in archive files
- Zero data loss - all content preserved
Command Comparison
Planning Commands (BOS-AI → Project Plan):
| Command | Purpose | Duration | Output | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/foundations |
Process & sync BOS-AI documents (init/refresh/status/validate) | 2-5 min | Structured YAML | Starting from BOS-AI |
/architect |
Design system architecture (Auto/Engaged modes) | 10-15 min | architecture.md | Technical decisions before building |
/bootstrap |
Generate project plan (Auto/Engaged/Preview modes) | 1-5 min | project-plan.md | Plan-driven development |
/plan |
View/manage project state | Instant | Status, gates, progress | Tracking & management |
/skills |
Discover SaaS patterns | Instant | Skill details | Finding code patterns |
Execution Commands (Building & Shipping):
| Command | Purpose | Duration | Output | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/coord |
Execute missions with specialists | 1-8 hours | Code, tests, docs | Building, fixing, deploying |
/meeting |
Strategic conversations | 15-60 min | Discussion, ideas | Brainstorming, planning |
/design-review |
Full UI/UX audit | 1-2 hours | Design report | Pre-launch quality checks |
/recon |
Quick design analysis | 30-45 min | Design insights | Understanding existing UI |
/report |
Stakeholder updates | 5-10 min | Progress report | Communication, tracking |
/pmd |
Failure analysis | 30-60 min | Root cause analysis | Learning from mistakes |
/dailyreport |
Daily progress + social posts | 2-5 min | Blog + Twitter + LinkedIn | Build-in-public updates |
/blog |
Topic-driven blog + social posts | 2-5 min | Blog + Twitter + LinkedIn | Opinion pieces, tutorials, deep dives |
/planarchive |
Intelligent tracking file cleanup | 2-5 min | Archive files | Token optimization, context management |
🎖️ Community Success Stories
"Each project gets its own elite team that understands the codebase perfectly. Game changer."
— Alex Chen, Solo Founder ($15k MRR)
"Project-local agents mean no confusion, no context switching. They just get it."
— Sarah Martinez, Technical Founder
"Clean deployments, isolated teams per project. Finally, AI that scales with my workflow."
— David Kim, Multi-Project Founder
"The v2.0 memory system is incredible - agents remember decisions from days ago. No more context loss."
— AGENT-11 Beta Tester
🔥 Mission Library (20 Missions)
Setup Missions (NEW!)
- 🚀 DEV-SETUP - Greenfield project initialization (30-45 min)
- 🎯 DEV-ALIGNMENT - Existing project understanding (45-60 min)
- ⚙️ OPSDEV-SETUP - DevOps & environment configuration (20-30 min)
- 📋 CLAUDE-SETUP - CLAUDE.md creation & sync (15-25 min)
- 🔌 CONNECT-MCP - MCP discovery and connection (45-90 min)
Development Missions
- 🏗️ BUILD - New feature development (4-8 hours)
- 🐛 FIX - Emergency bug resolution (1-3 hours)
- ♻️ REFACTOR - Code quality improvement (2-4 hours)
- 🚀 DEPLOY - Production deployment (1-2 hours)
- 📚 DOCUMENT - Documentation creation (2-4 hours)
- 📐 ARCHITECTURE - System architecture documentation (2-3 hours)
Strategic Missions
- 📋 PRODUCT-DESCRIPTION - Product definition with risk management (2-3 hours)
- 💡 MVP - Minimum viable product (1-3 days)
- 🔄 MIGRATE - System migration (4-8 hours)
- ⚡ OPTIMIZE - Performance optimization (3-6 hours)
- 🔒 SECURITY - Security audit & fixes (4-6 hours)
- 🔌 INTEGRATE - Third-party integration (3-6 hours)
- 🎯 RELEASE - Release management (2-4 hours)
Mission Command Quick Reference
| Mission | Command | Input Required | Duration | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setup Missions | ||||
| DEV-SETUP | /coord dev-setup ideation.md |
✅ Ideation | 30-45 min | New project initialization |
| DEV-ALIGNMENT | /coord dev-alignment |
❌ None | 45-60 min | Understand existing project |
| CONNECT-MCP | /coord connect-mcp |
❌ None | 45-90 min | Setup external integrations |
| Core Development | ||||
| BUILD | /coord build requirements.md |
✅ Requirements | 3-8 hours | Feature development |
| MVP | /coord mvp vision.md |
✅ Vision | 6-12 hours | Minimum viable product |
| FIX | /coord fix bug-report.md |
✅ Bug Report | 1-4 hours | Bug resolution |
| REFACTOR | /coord refactor |
❌ None | 2-4 hours | Code improvement |
| DEPLOY | /coord deploy |
❌ None | 1-2 hours | Production deployment |
| DOCUMENT | /coord document |
❌ None | 2-4 hours | Documentation creation |
| MIGRATE | /coord migrate requirements.md |
✅ Requirements | 4-8 hours | System migration |
| Specialized Operations | ||||
| ARCHITECTURE | /coord architecture vision.md |
✅ Vision | 2-4 hours | System design |
| OPTIMIZE | /coord optimize |
❌ None | 3-6 hours | Performance tuning |
| SECURITY | /coord security |
❌ None | 4-6 hours | Security audit |
| INTEGRATE | /coord integrate requirements.md |
✅ Requirements | 3-6 hours | Third-party APIs |
| RELEASE | /coord release |
❌ None | 2-4 hours | Deployment prep |
| Business & Growth | ||||
| PRODUCT-DESCRIPTION | /coord product-description vision.md |
✅ Vision | 2-3 hours | Marketing copy |
| Operations | ||||
| GENESIS | /coord genesis |
❌ None | 1-2 hours | Project reconnaissance |
| RECON | /coord recon |
❌ None | 1-3 hours | Design intelligence |
Input File Templates: Available in /templates/mission-inputs/
Legend: ✅ Required input file | ❌ No input needed
Mission MCP Profile Guide
Some missions benefit from specific MCP profiles for optimal performance and context efficiency:
- Testing missions (BUILD with E2E tests, QA phases) →
/mcp-switch testing(adds Playwright) - Deployment missions (DEPLOY, RELEASE) →
/mcp-switch deployment(Netlify + Railway access) - Database work (MIGRATE, schema changes) →
/mcp-switch database-stagingor/mcp-switch database-production - Full-stack development (complex features) →
/mcp-switch fullstack(all development MCPs) - General development (BUILD, FIX, REFACTOR) →
/mcp-switch core(lightweight, 80% less context)
Quick Commands:
- Switch profiles:
/mcp-switch [profile-name] - See all profiles:
/mcp-list - Check current:
/mcp-status
🔄 Updating Existing Installation
Already have AGENT-11? Get the latest features including the /coord mission system:
# Single command to update your project
cd /path/to/your/project
curl -sSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TheWayWithin/agent-11/main/project/deployment/scripts/install.sh | bash -s core
🛡️ Your CLAUDE.md is Safe! AGENT-11 uses a two-file architecture:
Your Project
├── CLAUDE.md ← Your personal preferences (NEVER touched)
└── .claude/
└── CLAUDE.md ← AGENT-11 library instructions (managed by installer)
- ✅ Your root
/CLAUDE.mdis never modified or overwritten - ✅ AGENT-11 installs to
.claude/CLAUDE.mdonly - ✅ Existing
.claude/CLAUDE.mdis backed up before updating - ✅ Both files are read automatically by Claude Code
📋 CLAUDE.md Architecture Guide → - Full details on the two-file system
🛠️ Troubleshooting
Complete Troubleshooting Guide →
💖 Support AGENT-11
AGENT-11 is a passion project that's 100% free and always will be. If this framework has:
- ⚡ Saved you weeks of development time
- 🚀 Helped you ship your MVP faster
- 💰 Eliminated the need for expensive contractors
Consider supporting its development:
Your support keeps AGENT-11 free, actively maintained, and growing with new capabilities!
Other ways to support:
- ⭐ Star the repo to help others discover it
- 📢 Share AGENT-11 with fellow founders and developers
- 🐛 Report bugs and suggest features
- 📝 Contribute to documentation
🤝 Join the Elite
AGENT-11 is open source and community-driven. We welcome contributions from fellow operators.
📜 License
MIT - Use AGENT-11 to build your empire.
Ready to deploy your project squad?
🚀 Project Setup · 📖 Quick Start · 📚 Full Documentation
"One project. One founder. Eleven specialists. Unlimited potential."
Reviews (0)
Sign in to leave a review.
Leave a reviewNo results found