densely

mcp
Security Audit
Fail
Health Warn
  • License — License: MIT
  • Description — Repository has a description
  • Active repo — Last push 0 days ago
  • Low visibility — Only 5 GitHub stars
Code Fail
  • eval() — Dynamic code execution via eval() in densely/neural.py
Permissions Pass
  • Permissions — No dangerous permissions requested

No AI report is available for this listing yet.

SUMMARY

Lossless context compression for LLMs: 2x-8x fewer tokens, byte-exact reconstruction (sha256-verified). MCP server for Claude Code & Cursor.

README.md

densely

Lossless context compression for LLMs. Pack any text into 2x–8x fewer
tokens with guaranteed byte-exact reconstruction — verified by sha256 on
every decompress.

demo

An o200k token can carry up to ~17.6 bits of information, but typical code
occupies tokens at only ~5–6 bits each. densely reclaims the difference:

text -> lzma -> 16-bit chunks -> 65,536 single-token English words

Each carrier word (" the", " of", …) costs exactly 1 token — the
o200k pre-tokenizer never merges across word boundaries — so every token
in the payload carries 2 bytes of compressed data (16 of the ~17.6
theoretically available bits, 91% of channel capacity).

Benchmarks

Reproduce with python3 bench.py (fixed seeds, stdlib code sample):

Scenario Backend Tokens (o200k) Ratio Saved
Code (argparse.py + densely) lzma 21,659 → 10,726 2.02x 50.5%
Code (same sample) neural 21,659 → 2,538 8.53x 88.3%
Code never seen by the model neural 3,433 → 472 7.27x 86.3%
JSON (code search, 100 hits) lzma 15,465 → 1,995 7.75x 87.1%
Logs (SRE incident, ~1600 ln) lzma 117,766 → 16,962 6.94x 85.6%

The neural backend (--backend neural, python3 bench.py --neural) drives
an integer arithmetic coder with next-token probabilities from
Qwen2.5-Coder-0.5B, NNCP-style batched across segments. The 88.3% figure
benefits from the model having seen Python's stdlib during training; the
86.3% row is this repo's own sources — code that did not exist before
2026-08-08 — and is the honest number for novel code (~0.56 bit/byte).

For comparison, Headroom
reports 15–20% savings for coding agents and 60–95% on JSON — achieved by
dropping content from context, with originals kept in a local cache with
a TTL. densely keeps the full data in the context itself, restorable
byte-for-byte with no external storage and no expiry.

Lossless compression below the entropy of the data is mathematically
impossible (Shannon; see also Fundamental Limits of Prompt
Compression
) — within that bound,
densely sits near the practical ceiling for a deterministic, CPU-only
method.

Usage

pip install "densely[mcp]"
# extras: [neural] for the neural backend (torch + transformers)

densely compress  big_context.txt -o payload.dense
densely compress  src.py -o payload.dense --backend neural
densely decompress payload.dense   -o restored.txt   # byte-identical
densely stats     file1.py file2.json                # token savings

Library:

from densely import compress, decompress

payload = compress(text)        # ~2x-8x fewer tokens
assert decompress(payload) == text  # always true, sha256-checked

compress via the CLI self-verifies the round trip before writing output;
decompress raises ValueError on any corruption or hash mismatch.

Use it in Claude Code / Cursor (MCP)

# Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user densely -- "$(which densely-mcp)"

# Cursor (~/.cursor/mcp.json) and other MCP clients
{"mcpServers": {"densely": {"command": "/absolute/path/to/densely-mcp"}}}

Three tools:

  • compress_file(path) — agent calls this instead of reading a large
    log/JSON/dump: gets a preview + dense payload at 2x-8x fewer tokens.
  • compress_text(text) — same for a big tool output already in hand.
  • expand(payload | payload_file, start_line, end_line) — exact
    original back, sha256-verified; line ranges let the agent pay only for
    the slice it needs.

Every compression also writes a .dense sidecar file next to the
original — a plain text file you can commit, ship, or archive; no cache,
no TTL, nothing to expire. Small payloads are additionally returned
inline. This matters for context compaction: a compaction summary
replaces old conversation content, so an inline payload alone could be
summarized away — but the sidecar on disk (and its path, which carries
into summaries) cannot. If you use the Anthropic compaction API beta
directly, add this to your instructions so payload references survive
verbatim:

Preserve any densely payload references (paths ending in .dense, or
lines starting with DENSE1/DENSE2) verbatim in the summary. Do not
call any tools while writing this summary.

Automatic mode (hook)

Zero-effort savings: a PostToolUse hook compresses every large tool
output (Bash output, Read of non-code files, >= 5,000 tokens) on the
fly — the agent sees a preview + stats, exact content stays available
via search/expand, and every replacement is recorded in a savings
ledger (stats tool, or the running total shown in each replacement).

Add to ~/.claude/settings.json (absolute paths — hooks run outside
your shell PATH):

{
  "hooks": {
    "PostToolUse": [{
      "matcher": "Read|Bash",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "/absolute/path/to/densely-hook",
        "timeout": 30
      }]
    }]
  }
}

(which densely-hook after install gives the absolute path — hooks run
outside your shell PATH, so absolute paths only.)

Tune with DENSELY_HOOK_MIN_TOKENS (default 5000). Code files the agent
is editing are never touched.

When it saves tokens (and when it doesn't)

Agent sessions resend the whole history to the API on every turn, so
anything sitting in context is paid for again and again. What densely
does to each kind of content:

Content in context Savings Why
Code the agent is actively editing none — don't compress it the agent must read it; payloads are unreadable
Reference code (read once, kept "just in case") 20–40% exact copy stays cheap; expand a line range when needed
Tool outputs: logs, JSON, dumps 78–87% the agent never needed all 1,500 lines — preview + targeted expand covers it
Anything that must survive compaction indirect payloads pass through compaction verbatim; summaries don't

Note on prompt caching: cached history is cheaper, but the context
window stays the same size — densely primarily buys you room, then
money.

vs. the field

The main players make different trade-offs (numbers from each project's
own published benchmarks):

densely Headroom claw-compactor
Approach entropy coding -> single-token carrier lossy selection, model-readable output 14 readable transform stages (2 lossy)
Exact recovery always: sha256-verified, in-conversation TTL cache, retrieval on demand LRU "RewindStore", no verification documented
Logs 85.6% ~92% (lossy) 24.1%
JSON 87.1% (lossless) 60–95% (lossy) 81.9% (via lossy sampling)
Code (active use) none — by design 15–20% (AST skeletons) 25%
Model reads output no (search/expand tools) yes yes
Agent integrations MCP + hook + skill (Claude Code, Cursor) proxy + wrap + MCP CLI only

Different philosophies: maximum savings with silent degradation vs.
exactness or nothing. Readable-lossy tools win on content the model
must keep reading; densely wins when the data must never be wrong and
must survive compaction, export, and machine moves. Use both.

The honest caveats

  • The payload is not readable — by humans or by the model. It looks
    like a stream of random English words. Use it as a dense carrier for
    exact data (chat history, tool outputs, source files) alongside a
    readable summary; expand it with a tool call when exact content is
    needed.
  • Savings depend on redundancy: highly repetitive data (JSON, logs)
    compresses 7x+, dense prose ~1.5–2x, already-compressed or random data
    ~0% (payload is never larger than a few header tokens worse than raw
    input — check stats before shipping).
  • Density is per-tokenizer; reconstruction is always byte-exact. Two
    alphabets ship today: o200k (65,536 words, exactly 16 bits/token on
    OpenAI o200k) and claude1 (1,024 words, exactly 10 bits/token on
    Claude Sonnet 5 / Opus 5 / Fable 5 — harvested empirically through the
    count_tokens API, since Anthropic's vocabulary isn't public). The MCP
    server and hook default to claude1; the CLI defaults to o200k
    (--alphabet / DENSELY_ALPHABET to override). Measured on a 172KB
    log with count_tokens on Sonnet 5: raw 93,117 tokens -> claude1
    payload 25,904 (72.2% saved; the o200k alphabet managed only 47.8%
    there). Verify any alphabet against any target with
    python3 tools/calibrate.py; harvest new ones with
    tools/build_alphabet.py.
  • Neural backend caveats: slow (~85 KB of code takes minutes on Apple
    Silicon vs milliseconds for lzma) and requires torch + a ~1 GB model
    download on first use. Reconstruction is bit-exact only when
    decompression runs the same model/software stack as compression — which
    is why compress(backend="neural") verifies the full round trip before
    returning and silently falls back to lzma on any mismatch. The 100%
    guarantee never rests on the neural path.

Densely Pro (coming)

The library is MIT and stays free. We're building a managed tier for
teams running agents in production:

  • Cloud neural compression — 86% on code without a local GPU
  • Managed proxy — savings with zero code changes
  • Team dashboard — token savings per agent, per day, in dollars
  • Cross-machine payloads — compress in CI, expand anywhere

Join the waitlist → (early access +
founding-user pricing)

Roadmap

  • Cross-machine determinism for the neural backend (integer/fixed-point
    inference or a mismatch-tolerant coder), so payloads compressed on one
    machine decompress on another.
  • Larger/faster models via llama.cpp for better ratios at higher speed.

Tests

python3 -m pytest tests/test_core.py tests/test_mcp.py   # fast suites
python3 -m pytest tests/test_neural.py                   # slow (~1 min): real LLM round trips

Fast suite: byte-exact round-trips (unicode, CJK, emoji, random bytes,
payload-lookalike inputs), tamper detection, carrier-alphabet density.
Neural suite: single- and multi-segment round trips, no-silent-fallback,
beats-lzma check.

Reviews (0)

No results found