claude-slop-detector
Health Uyari
- License — License: MIT
- Description — Repository has a description
- Active repo — Last push 0 days ago
- Low visibility — Only 6 GitHub stars
Code Basarisiz
- rm -rf — Recursive force deletion command in install.sh
Permissions Gecti
- Permissions — No dangerous permissions requested
Bu listing icin henuz AI raporu yok.
Claude Code skill for detecting AI-generated writing patterns (slop) in content
Claude Slop Detector
A Claude Code skill for detecting AI-generated writing patterns ("slop") in content.
What is "Slop"?
AI slop is content that sounds generically AI-generated — the kind of writing that could be sent to anyone in your industry without modification. It's characterized by:
- Overused phrases like "delve into," "game-changer," and "it's worth noting"
- Uniform sentence lengths (every sentence 10-15 words)
- Staccato fragment spam (short. punchy. sentences. everywhere.)
- Over-balanced sections with diplomatic hedging
- Manufactured enthusiasm and fake personality
This skill helps you identify these patterns and fix them.
Installation
Option 1: Skills CLI
npx skills add aplaceforallmystuff/claude-slop-detector
Option 2: Copy to your Claude Code skills directory
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/aplaceforallmystuff/claude-slop-detector.git
# Copy to your Claude Code skills directory
cp -r claude-slop-detector/skills/slop-detector ~/.claude/skills/
Option 3: Clone directly to skills directory
git clone https://github.com/aplaceforallmystuff/claude-slop-detector.git ~/.claude/skills/slop-detector
Option 4: Manual installation
- Create the directory:
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/slop-detector - Download SKILL.md to that directory
Usage
Once installed, the skill activates when you ask Claude Code to:
- "Check this draft for AI slop"
- "Audit this content for AI patterns"
- "Run slop detection on this file"
- "Is this writing too AI-sounding?"
Example
> Check this draft for slop: "In today's digital landscape, it's worth noting
that AI has become a game-changer for content creation. Let's delve into
how you can leverage these cutting-edge solutions to unlock your potential."
Output:
## Slop Detection Report
**30-Second Test:** FAIL - could be sent to anyone
**Overall Slop Score:** 21 - High Risk
### Tier 1 Findings (Remove Immediately)
- "delve into" - Replace with: examine, explore, look at
- "game-changer" - Replace with: specific impact description
- "it's worth noting" - Remove entirely
- "cutting-edge solutions" - Replace with: specific tools/methods
- "unlock your potential" - Replace with: specific outcome
...
How It Works
The skill uses a tiered detection system:
Tier 1: Almost Always AI (Remove Immediately)
Phrases so strongly associated with AI that their presence alone suggests unedited output:
- "delve into" / "delve"
- "game-changing" / "revolutionary"
- "it's worth noting that"
- "moreover" / "furthermore"
- "unlock your potential"
- "cutting-edge solutions"
Research shows "delve" usage increased 10.45x post-ChatGPT (Finnish study, 56,878 essays).
Tier 2: Suspicious (Check Context)
Problematic when overused or clustered:
- "here's the thing" (repeated)
- "at the end of the day"
- "comprehensive and thorough"
- "let's dive in"
Tier 3: Watch for Patterns
Fine individually, problematic in clusters:
- "however" starting every paragraph
- "firstly," "secondly," "thirdly"
- "robust," "seamless," "scalable" together
Structural Tells
Beyond phrases, the skill detects:
- Sentence uniformity - all sentences same length
- Staccato fragment spam - "Short. Punchy. Sentences."
- Over-balanced sections - diplomatic hedging everywhere
- List addiction - bullets where prose works better
- Manufactured personality - fake developer voice
Slop Score
The skill calculates a numerical score:
| Score | Risk Level | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 0-5 | Low | Minor edits needed |
| 6-12 | Medium | Significant editing required |
| 13+ | High | Likely unedited AI output |
The 30-Second Test
The fastest way to identify AI slop:
"Could this exact content be sent to anyone in my industry?"
If yes, it's slop. Specificity separates genuine insight from generic templates.
License
MIT License - see LICENSE
Acknowledgments
Detection patterns informed by:
- Finnish study on post-ChatGPT writing changes (56,878 essays)
- Georgia Tech analysis of 168.3M academic articles
- Biomedical literature analysis of AI marker co-occurrence
Related Skills
Part of the aplaceforallmystuff skills collection:
- the-antislop — More comprehensive detection + editor mode (35+ patterns)
- voice-analyzer — Create a voice profile from your writing samples
- voice-editor — Edit content to match your voice profile
The goal isn't perfect avoidance of any single phrase — it's writing that sounds like a specific human with specific opinions, not a very polite committee trying not to offend anyone.
Yorumlar (0)
Yorum birakmak icin giris yap.
Yorum birakSonuc bulunamadi