RagScore
Health Gecti
- License — License: Apache-2.0
- Description — Repository has a description
- Active repo — Last push 0 days ago
- Community trust — 30 GitHub stars
Code Gecti
- Code scan — Scanned 12 files during light audit, no dangerous patterns found
Permissions Gecti
- Permissions — No dangerous permissions requested
This tool generates QA datasets and evaluates Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. It allows developers to quickly test their local or cloud-based RAG endpoints via CLI, Python scripts, or Jupyter notebooks.
Security Assessment
Overall risk: Low. The tool is designed to evaluate RAG systems, which inherently requires making network requests to your specified local or cloud API endpoints. A light code scan of 12 files found no dangerous patterns, no hardcoded secrets, and no dangerous permissions requested. Because it analyzes your documents to generate test questions, you should be mindful of sending sensitive data to external LLM providers (like OpenAI) if you opt out of using local models like Ollama.
Quality Assessment
The project demonstrates strong quality signals. It is actively maintained, with the most recent push occurring today, and is protected by the permissive Apache-2.0 license. The repository has accumulated 30 GitHub stars, indicating a baseline of positive community trust and adoption. The provided documentation is clear, well-structured, and makes installation straightforward.
Verdict
Safe to use.
⚡️ The "1-Minute RAG Audit" — Generate QA datasets & evaluate RAG systems in Colab, Jupyter, or CLI. Privacy-first, async, visual reports.
Generate QA datasets & evaluate RAG systems in 2 commands
🔒 Privacy-First • ⚡ Lightning Fast • 🤖 Any LLM • 🏠 Local or Cloud • 🌍 Multilingual
⚡ 2-Line RAG Evaluation
# Step 1: Generate QA pairs from your docs
ragscore generate docs/
# Step 2: Evaluate your RAG system
ragscore evaluate http://localhost:8000/query
That's it. Get accuracy scores and incorrect QA pairs instantly.
============================================================
✅ EXCELLENT: 85/100 correct (85.0%)
Average Score: 4.20/5.0
============================================================
❌ 15 Incorrect Pairs:
1. Q: "What is RAG?"
Score: 2/5 - Factually incorrect
2. Q: "How does retrieval work?"
Score: 3/5 - Incomplete answer
🚀 Quick Start
Install
pip install ragscore # Core (works with Ollama)
pip install "ragscore[openai]" # + OpenAI support
pip install "ragscore[notebook]" # + Jupyter/Colab support
pip install "ragscore[all]" # + All providers
Option 1: Python API (Notebook-Friendly)
Perfect for Jupyter, Colab, and rapid iteration. Get instant visualizations.
from ragscore import quick_test
# 1. Audit your RAG in one line
result = quick_test(
endpoint="http://localhost:8000/query", # Your RAG API
docs="docs/", # Your documents
n=10, # Number of test questions
)
# 1b. Tailored QA — target specific audiences
result = quick_test(
endpoint="http://localhost:8000/query",
docs="docs/",
audience="developers", # Who asks the questions?
purpose="api-integration", # What's the document for?
)
# 2. See the report
result.plot()
# 3. Inspect failures
bad_rows = result.df[result.df['score'] < 3]
display(bad_rows[['question', 'rag_answer', 'reason']])
Rich Object API:
result.accuracy- Accuracy scoreresult.df- Pandas DataFrame of all resultsresult.plot()- 3-panel visualization (4-panel withdetailed=True)result.corrections- List of items to fix
Option 2: CLI (Production)
Generate QA Pairs
# Set API key (or use local Ollama - no key needed!)
export OPENAI_API_KEY="sk-..."
# Generate from any document
ragscore generate paper.pdf
ragscore generate docs/*.pdf --concurrency 10
# Tailored QA generation — target specific audiences
ragscore generate docs/ --audience developers --purpose faq
ragscore generate docs/ --audience customers --purpose "pre-sales"
ragscore generate docs/ --audience "compliance auditors" --purpose "security audit"
Evaluate Your RAG
# Point to your RAG endpoint
ragscore evaluate http://localhost:8000/query
# Custom options
ragscore evaluate http://api/ask --model gpt-4o --output results.json
🔬 Detailed Multi-Metric Evaluation
Go beyond a single score. Add detailed=True to get 5 diagnostic dimensions per answer — in the same single LLM call.
result = quick_test(
endpoint=my_rag,
docs="docs/",
n=10,
detailed=True, # ⭐ Enable multi-metric evaluation
)
# Inspect per-question metrics
display(result.df[[
"question", "score", "correctness", "completeness",
"relevance", "conciseness", "faithfulness"
]])
# Radar chart + 4-panel visualization
result.plot()
==================================================
✅ PASSED: 9/10 correct (90%)
Average Score: 4.3/5.0
Threshold: 70%
──────────────────────────────────────────────────
Correctness: 4.5/5.0
Completeness: 4.2/5.0
Relevance: 4.8/5.0
Conciseness: 4.1/5.0
Faithfulness: 4.6/5.0
==================================================
| Metric | What it measures | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Correctness | Semantic match to golden answer | 5 = fully correct |
| Completeness | Covers all key points | 5 = fully covered |
| Relevance | Addresses the question asked | 5 = perfectly on-topic |
| Conciseness | Focused, no filler | 5 = concise and precise |
| Faithfulness | No fabricated claims | 5 = fully faithful |
CLI:
ragscore evaluate http://localhost:8000/query --detailed
📓 Full demo notebook — build a mini RAG and test it with detailed metrics.
🎯 Audience & Purpose demo — generate tailored QA for developers, customers, auditors, and more.
🏠 Ollama local demo — 100% private RAG evaluation with no API keys.
🏠 100% Private with Local LLMs
# Use Ollama - no API keys, no cloud, 100% private
ollama pull llama3.1
ragscore generate confidential_docs/*.pdf
ragscore evaluate http://localhost:8000/query
Perfect for: Healthcare 🏥 • Legal ⚖️ • Finance 🏦 • Research 🔬
Ollama Model Recommendations
RAGScore generates complex structured QA pairs (question + answer + rationale + support span) in JSON format. This requires models with strong instruction-following and JSON output capabilities.
| Model | Size | Min RAM | QA Quality | Recommended |
|---|---|---|---|---|
llama3.1:70b |
40GB | 48GB VRAM | Excellent | GPU server (A100, L40) |
qwen2.5:32b |
18GB | 24GB VRAM | Excellent | GPU server (A10, L20) |
llama3.1:8b |
4.7GB | 8GB VRAM | Good | Best local choice |
qwen2.5:7b |
4.4GB | 8GB VRAM | Good | Good local alternative |
mistral:7b |
4.1GB | 8GB VRAM | Good | Good local alternative |
llama3.2:3b |
2.0GB | 4GB RAM | Fair | CPU-only / testing |
qwen2.5:1.5b |
1.0GB | 2GB RAM | Poor | Not recommended |
Minimum recommended: 8B+ models. Smaller models (1.5B–3B) produce lower quality support spans and may timeout on longer chunks.
Ollama Performance Guide
# Recommended: 8B model with concurrency 2 for local machines
ollama pull llama3.1:8b
ragscore generate docs/ --provider ollama --model llama3.1:8b
# GPU server (A10/L20): larger model with higher concurrency
ollama pull qwen2.5:32b
ragscore generate docs/ --provider ollama --model qwen2.5:32b --concurrency 5
Expected performance (28 chunks, 5 QA pairs per chunk):
| Hardware | Model | Time | Concurrency |
|---|---|---|---|
| MacBook (CPU) | llama3.2:3b | ~45 min | 2 |
| MacBook (CPU) | llama3.1:8b | ~25 min | 2 |
| A10 (24GB) | llama3.1:8b | ~3–5 min | 5 |
| L20/L40 (48GB) | qwen2.5:32b | ~3–5 min | 5 |
| OpenAI API | gpt-4o-mini | ~2 min | 10 |
RAGScore auto-reduces concurrency to 2 for local Ollama to avoid GPU/CPU contention.
🔌 Supported LLMs
| Provider | Setup | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Ollama | ollama serve |
Local, free, private |
| OpenAI | export OPENAI_API_KEY="sk-..." |
Best quality |
| Anthropic | export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY="..." |
Long context |
| DashScope | export DASHSCOPE_API_KEY="..." |
Qwen models |
| vLLM | export LLM_BASE_URL="..." |
Production-grade |
| Any OpenAI-compatible | export LLM_BASE_URL="..." |
Groq, Together, etc. |
📊 Output Formats
Generated QA Pairs (output/generated_qas.jsonl)
{
"id": "abc123",
"question": "What is RAG?",
"answer": "RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) combines...",
"rationale": "This is explicitly stated in the introduction...",
"support_span": "RAG systems retrieve relevant documents...",
"difficulty": "medium",
"source_path": "docs/rag_intro.pdf"
}
Evaluation Results (--output results.json)
{
"summary": {
"total": 100,
"correct": 85,
"incorrect": 15,
"accuracy": 0.85,
"avg_score": 4.2
},
"incorrect_pairs": [
{
"question": "What is RAG?",
"golden_answer": "RAG combines retrieval with generation...",
"rag_answer": "RAG is a database system.",
"score": 2,
"reason": "Factually incorrect - RAG is not a database"
}
]
}
🧪 Python API
from ragscore import run_pipeline, run_evaluation
# Generate QA pairs
run_pipeline(paths=["docs/"], concurrency=10)
# Generate tailored QA pairs for specific audiences
run_pipeline(
paths=["docs/"],
audience="support engineers",
purpose="fine-tuning a support chatbot",
)
# Evaluate RAG
results = run_evaluation(
endpoint="http://localhost:8000/query",
model="gpt-4o", # LLM for judging
)
print(f"Accuracy: {results.accuracy:.1%}")
🤖 AI Agent Integration
RAGScore is designed for AI agents and automation:
# Structured CLI with predictable output
ragscore generate docs/ --concurrency 5
ragscore evaluate http://api/query --output results.json
# Exit codes: 0 = success, 1 = error
# JSON output for programmatic parsing
CLI Reference:
| Command | Description |
|---|---|
ragscore generate <paths> |
Generate QA pairs from documents |
ragscore generate <paths> --audience <who> |
Tailored QA for specific audience |
ragscore generate <paths> --purpose <why> |
Focus QA on document purpose |
ragscore evaluate <endpoint> |
Evaluate RAG against golden QAs |
ragscore evaluate <endpoint> --detailed |
Multi-metric evaluation |
ragscore --help |
Show all commands and options |
ragscore generate --help |
Show generate options |
ragscore evaluate --help |
Show evaluate options |
⚙️ Configuration
Zero config required. Optional environment variables:
export RAGSCORE_CHUNK_SIZE=512 # Chunk size for documents
export RAGSCORE_QUESTIONS_PER_CHUNK=5 # QAs per chunk
export RAGSCORE_WORK_DIR=/path/to/dir # Working directory
🔐 Privacy & Security
| Data | Cloud LLM | Local LLM |
|---|---|---|
| Documents | ✅ Local | ✅ Local |
| Text chunks | ⚠️ Sent to LLM | ✅ Local |
| Generated QAs | ✅ Local | ✅ Local |
| Evaluation results | ✅ Local | ✅ Local |
Compliance: GDPR ✅ • HIPAA ✅ (with local LLMs) • SOC 2 ✅
🧪 Development
git clone https://github.com/HZYAI/RagScore.git
cd RagScore
pip install -e ".[dev,all]"
pytest
📡 Telemetry
RAGScore collects telemetry only in MCP server mode (ragscore serve). Standard CLI and Python API usage do not send telemetry.
We collect limited anonymous operational metrics to understand feature usage and improve reliability. No document content, prompts, QA text, model outputs, API keys, endpoint URLs, or file paths are collected.
Collected in MCP mode:
- MCP tool invoked
- LLM provider and model name
ragscoreversion, Python version, OS type- Success/failure status
- Random anonymous installation ID
Opt out:
export RAGSCORE_NO_TELEMETRY=1
�� Links
- GitHub • PyPI • Issues • Discussions
⭐ Star us on GitHub if RAGScore helps you!
Made with ❤️ for the RAG community
Yorumlar (0)
Yorum birakmak icin giris yap.
Yorum birakSonuc bulunamadi