epistemic-protocols

skill
SUMMARY

Epistemic protocols for Claude Code — structure human-AI interaction quality at every decision point

README.md

Epistemic Protocols

한국어

When AI collaboration goes off-track, you redo everything. These protocols catch direction errors early — at the plan level, not the code level. Fix the direction, not the implementation.

Why

Correcting a wrong direction at the plan level costs one conversation turn.
At the code level, it costs hours of rework.
These protocols insert structured checkpoints at decision points — intent, goal, context, perspective, execution — so you and AI stay aligned before committing to implementation.

Quick Start

Claude Code

Install all protocols and utilities:

curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jongwony/epistemic-protocols/main/scripts/install.sh | bash

Then run /onboard — start with a quick recommendation based on your recent sessions, then optionally continue to guided learning with scenarios, trials, and quizzes.

Codex

Paste in Codex and run:

$skill-installer install these skills from jongwony/epistemic-protocols:
- prothesis/skills/frame
- syneidesis/skills/gap
- hermeneia/skills/clarify
- katalepsis/skills/grasp
- telos/skills/goal
- aitesis/skills/inquire
- horismos/skills/bound
- analogia/skills/ground
- prosoche/skills/attend
- epharmoge/skills/contextualize
- epistemic-cooperative/skills/onboard

Restart Codex, then start with $onboard.

Notes
  • This installs 10 protocols + onboard. /report, /dashboard, reflexion, write are not included.
  • To install a single skill, use the same skill-installer pattern with one path.
  • This README is the source of truth for the Codex-supported install set.

Protocols

Protocol Command When to use
Hermeneia /clarify AI keeps building what you didn't ask for
Telos /goal You know you want something but can't define success
Aitesis /inquire AI charges ahead without asking what it needs to know
Prothesis /frame Need to look at this from multiple angles, not sure which
Analogia /ground AI's advice sounds right in theory but unclear in your context
Syneidesis /gap About to commit but might be missing something
Prosoche /attend Want execution readiness checked and risky actions gated for your judgment
Epharmoge /contextualize AI's output is correct but doesn't fit your situation
Horismos /bound You need to define what you know vs what AI should figure out
Katalepsis /grasp AI made big changes and you need to actually understand them

Concern clusters: Planning (/clarify, /goal, /inquire) · Analysis (/frame, /ground) · Decision (/gap) · Execution (/attend) · Verification (/contextualize) · Cross-cutting (/bound, /grasp)

Utilities

Plugin Command Purpose
Epistemic Cooperative /onboard, /report, /dashboard Protocol learning, usage analysis, and coverage dashboard

Design

Each protocol targets a specific point where AI collaboration can go wrong. For architecture details and design philosophy, see CLAUDE.md.

Greek Codex
Protocol Greek Meaning
Prothesis πρόθεσις Setting forth
Syneidesis συνείδησις Shared knowing
Hermeneia ἑρμηνεία Interpretation
Katalepsis κατάληψις Grasping, comprehension
Telos τέλος End, purpose
Horismos ὁρισμός A bounding
Aitesis αἴτησις Request, inquiry
Analogia ἀναλογία Proportion
Prosoche προσοχή Attention
Epharmoge ἐφαρμογή Application, fitting

Acknowledgments

  • @zzsza — Quiz-based participatory UX design contribution for Onboard

License

MIT

Reviews (0)

No results found