Agent-Gate
Health Uyari
- License — License: MIT
- Description — Repository has a description
- Active repo — Last push 0 days ago
- Low visibility — Only 5 GitHub stars
Code Gecti
- Code scan — Scanned 12 files during light audit, no dangerous patterns found
Permissions Gecti
- Permissions — No dangerous permissions requested
Bu listing icin henuz AI raporu yok.
Deterministic CI firewall for AI-generated pull requests
Agent Gate
No AI PR gets merged without proof.
Agent Gate is a deterministic CI firewall for AI-generated pull requests. It checks PR contracts, risky paths, agent instruction drift, workflow permissions, and test evidence before merge.
The Action uses no checkout of PR code, no runtime LLM calls, no repository script execution, and no policy loaded from an untrusted PR head. The same analyzer also powers local replay fixtures for deterministic demos.
Status
Agent Gate is pre-release. v0.1.1 is available as a GitHub prerelease and GitHub Marketplace Action. The core analyzer, CLI replay, root GitHub Action, PR comments, self-dogfooding workflow, and CI are implemented. APIs and rule names may change in later releases.
For released installs, prefer @v0.1.1 or a pinned commit SHA. @main tracks ongoing development.
See docs/v0.1.0-release-notes.md, docs/release-verification-v0.1.0.md, and docs/release-verification-v0.1.1.md for release notes and verification.
See docs/repository-governance.md for recommended branch protection and release safety settings.
See docs/launch-announcement-draft.md for a reusable launch announcement draft.
Feedback on AI-generated PR safety policies is welcome in #27.
What It Catches
- Out-of-contract edits: agent PRs changing files outside their declared scope.
- Workflow permission escalation: Actions workflows gaining broader write access.
- Agent control-plane drift (
agent-control-plane/drift): instruction or tool config changes that affect future agents. - Missing test evidence: high-risk source changes without matching test file changes.
- MCP config drift:
.mcp.jsonchanges that alter which tools agents can call.
Why
AI agents can open pull requests. Tests do not always catch:
- out-of-scope edits
- workflow permission escalation
- agent control-plane drift
- missing test evidence
- MCP config drift
Replay Demo
Human-readable output for demos:
pnpm --filter agent-gate build
node packages/cli/dist/main.js replay fixtures/unsafe-pr-zoo/workflow-permission-escalation
Example output:
Agent Gate: BLOCKED
ERROR workflow/permission-escalation
contents permission increased from read to write.
Path: .github/workflows/release.yml
ERROR workflow/dangerous-pattern
.github/workflows/release.yml contains a dangerous GitHub Actions workflow pattern.
Path: .github/workflows/release.yml
Machine-readable JSON report:
node packages/cli/dist/main.js replay fixtures/unsafe-pr-zoo/workflow-permission-escalation --format json
Expected result: Agent Gate reports a blocked PR with workflow/permission-escalation and workflow/dangerous-pattern findings.
Additional unsafe-pr-zoo demos:
agent-control-plane-drift: blocksAGENTS.mdchanges because they can change future agent behavior.out-of-scope-agent-edit: blocks a payment webhook edit outside the PR contract'sallowed_paths.missing-test-evidence: blocks an auth logic change without matching auth test changes.mcp-config-drift: blocks.mcp.jsonchanges because MCP config can change which tools an agent can call.
node packages/cli/dist/main.js replay fixtures/unsafe-pr-zoo/agent-control-plane-drift
node packages/cli/dist/main.js replay fixtures/unsafe-pr-zoo/out-of-scope-agent-edit
node packages/cli/dist/main.js replay fixtures/unsafe-pr-zoo/missing-test-evidence
node packages/cli/dist/main.js replay fixtures/unsafe-pr-zoo/mcp-config-drift
10-Minute Observe Path
Start in warn mode, learn your repo's risk profile, then turn proven policies into merge gates.
Add a checkout-free pull request workflow:
name: Agent Gate
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize, reopened, edited, labeled, unlabeled, ready_for_review]
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: read
jobs:
agent-gate:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: sjh9714/[email protected]
with:
github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
mode: warn
fail-on-block: false
Start with a small agent-gate.yml:
version: 1
mode: warn
contract:
required_for:
- agent
allow_missing_in_observe_mode: true
agent_detection:
labels:
- ai
- agent
- codex
branch_patterns:
- "codex/**"
- "ai/**"
high_risk_paths:
workflows:
paths:
- ".github/workflows/**"
severity: error
For an AI-generated PR, add a small contract to the PR body:
<!-- agent-gate-contract
version: 1
agent: codex
task: update auth session handling
allowed_paths:
- src/auth/**
- tests/auth/**
required_evidence:
- matching auth tests changed
-->
Read the first runs as observation, not proof of semantic correctness:
PASSED: safe to observeWARN: needs human decisionBLOCKED: must block once policy is enforced
The Markdown report leads with the human decision before the rule details. Example shape:
Agent Gate: NEEDS HUMAN DECISION
Why:
This PR changed `.github/workflows/release.yml` and added `secrets.*` usage.
Recommended next step:
Review the workflow change before merging.
Policy status:
Warning today; eligible to become a merge gate after tuning.
Install
Add Agent Gate to a repository with a pull request workflow. No checkout step is required.
name: Agent Gate
on:
pull_request:
types:
- opened
- synchronize
- reopened
- edited
- labeled
- unlabeled
- ready_for_review
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: read
jobs:
agent-gate:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: sjh9714/[email protected]
with:
github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
mode: warn
fail-on-block: false
Agent Gate loads policy from the PR base branch and does not execute PR branch code. Start with mode: warn and fail-on-block: false, tune the findings, then move to mode: block when ready.
To let Agent Gate create or update a PR report comment, add issues: write to the workflow permissions and set comment: true. Keep contents: read and pull-requests: read; no checkout step is needed. On fork pull requests, GitHub may still provide a read-only token, so comment failures are reported as warnings instead of failing the action.
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: read
issues: write
with:
comment: true
Create agent-gate.yml in the repository root:
version: 1
mode: warn
contract:
required_for:
- agent
allow_missing_in_observe_mode: true
agent_detection:
authors:
- github-copilot[bot]
labels:
- ai
- agent
- codex
branch_patterns:
- "codex/**"
- "ai/**"
high_risk_paths:
workflows:
paths:
- ".github/workflows/**"
severity: error
Teams can add auth, payments, infra, and agent-control-plane paths as their policy matures.
Packages
packages/core: pure analysis engine, built-in deterministic rules, and JSON/Markdown report renderers.packages/cli:agent-gate replay <fixture-dir>for deterministic local fixture demos.packages/action: Node 20 GitHub Action package that reads pull request data through GitHub APIs and calls the core analyzer.
Action Package
External users should prefer the root action with sjh9714/Agent-Gate@<ref>. The package-local action remains at packages/action/action.yml for this repository's own development workflow. Both use REST APIs only: they load agent-gate.yml from the PR base ref, read changed-file metadata and file contents from the API, run @agent-gate/core, write JSON/Markdown reports, set action outputs, write the job summary, and optionally upsert one marked PR report comment. They do not checkout the pull request or execute repository scripts.
Self-Dogfooding
Agent Gate runs against this repository's pull requests through .github/workflows/agent-gate.yml. The workflow uses sjh9714/Agent-Gate/packages/action@main, so pull requests do not execute Action code from their own branches while the action itself is under development. It starts in non-blocking warn mode while the project tunes early policy.
Commands
pnpm install
pnpm test
pnpm typecheck
pnpm lint
pnpm build
Principle
Agent Gate must not call LLMs at runtime, execute PR-controlled code, or load policy from an untrusted PR head. The core analysis package must remain independent from GitHub APIs.
Yorumlar (0)
Yorum birakmak icin giris yap.
Yorum birakSonuc bulunamadi