CrossFrame Skill Suite

CrossFrame Skill Suite is a Chinese structural diagnosis and writing skill suite for AI agents.

It is designed for tasks where a plain answer is not enough: complex relationships, teams, institutions, public disputes, historical materials, arguments, reader replies, research notes, and long-form Chinese essays.

The suite asks the agent to separate facts, evidence, scale, responsibility, mechanism, and expression before producing a readable answer.

What It Does

Diagnoses complex social, organizational, relational, and institutional situations.
Turns structural analysis into readable Chinese essays, replies, reports, memos, and case notes.
Reviews generated answers for evidence boundaries, overclaiming, source drift, and weak reasoning.
Supports public-issue analysis, organization repair, debate analysis, historical-source handling, concept teaching, and research-note workflows.
Preserves explicit invocation: CrossFrame should be used only when the user asks for it.

When To Use It

Use CrossFrame when the user asks for one of these:

structural diagnosis or cross-scale analysis
public issue, platform governance, policy, or institutional responsibility analysis
team, project, or organization repair
relationship or responsibility-chain analysis
historical materials, source-ledger boundaries, or archive/FOIA backlog handling
argument testing, debate mapping, or withdrawal conditions
turning analysis into a complete Chinese article
reviewing whether an answer actually reasons from evidence
follow-up inquiry after a completed analysis or article

Do not use it for simple factual lookup, arithmetic, ordinary chat, or tasks where the user did not ask for CrossFrame-style reasoning.

Main Entry

For multi-step work, start with:

crossframe-suite

The suite chooses the workflow and then routes to the needed specialist skills.

Common workflows:

crossframe -> crossframe-review
crossframe -> crossframe-essay -> crossframe-review
crossframe -> crossframe-public -> crossframe-essay -> crossframe-review
crossframe -> crossframe-org -> crossframe-essay -> crossframe-review
crossframe -> crossframe-history -> crossframe-essay -> crossframe-review
crossframe -> crossframe-dialogue
crossframe -> crossframe-notebook
crossframe -> crossframe-inquiry

Skill Areas

Skill	Purpose
`crossframe-suite`	Workflow router for multi-step CrossFrame tasks
`crossframe`	Core structural diagnosis
`crossframe-essay`	Converts analysis into complete Chinese essays
`crossframe-review`	Checks reasoning, evidence boundaries, and output quality
`crossframe-dialogue`	Reader replies, editorial responses, and short consultation answers
`crossframe-casebook`	Turns materials into reusable case entries
`crossframe-history`	Historical materials, source ledgers, and archive/FOIA boundaries
`crossframe-public`	Public issues, institutions, platforms, policies, and compliance materials
`crossframe-org`	Team, project, and organization repair
`crossframe-teach`	Plain-language concept explanation and exercises
`crossframe-debate`	Proposition testing, opposing arguments, and withdrawal conditions
`crossframe-notebook`	Reading notes for books, theories, articles, and excerpts
`crossframe-critical`	Named-only long-form structural critique
`crossframe-inquiry`	Follow-up questions after a completed CrossFrame workflow

Output Principles

CrossFrame outputs should:

show a concise reasoning outline before the final answer
distinguish fact, interpretation, mechanism candidate, and judgment level
avoid turning structural analysis into personality judgment
avoid presenting uncertain claims as closure
keep specialist terms mostly in the background and write for ordinary readers
preserve evidence boundaries when discussing public, institutional, historical, or current events

License

MIT License. See LICENSE.

crossframe-skill